IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352170.html

Spatial and neighborhood data in the collaborative cohort of cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R)

Author

Listed:
  • Jana A Hirsch
  • Lilah M Besser
  • Marcia Pescador Jimenez
  • Stephen T Dickinson
  • Talea Cornelius
  • Stephen T Francisco
  • Katherine Lawin
  • Hoda S Abdel Magid
  • Sandra S Albrecht
  • Norrina Bai Allen
  • Pallavi Balte
  • Sharrelle Barber
  • Lori A Bateman
  • Lauren B Beach
  • Jason P Block
  • Scott C Brown
  • Russell G Buhr
  • Earle C Chambers
  • James L Crooks
  • Ana V Diez Roux
  • Mitchell S V Elkind
  • Linda C Gallo
  • Penny Gordon-Larsen
  • Jose Gutierrez
  • Carmen R Isasi
  • Peter James
  • Suzanne E Judd
  • Alka M Kanaya
  • Namratha R Kandula
  • Joel D Kaufman
  • Kiarri N Kershaw
  • Anna M Kucharska-Newton
  • Erin R Kulick
  • Joyce S Lee
  • Gina S Lovasi
  • Dave Mauger
  • Leslie A McClure
  • Steven Melly
  • Sharon Stein Merkin
  • Yvonne L Michael
  • Gabriela R Oates
  • Brenda R Phillips
  • Jessica A Reese
  • Elizabeth A Regan
  • Cameron J Reimer
  • Daniel A Rodriguez
  • Tatjana Rundek
  • Michael Schembri
  • Mario Sims
  • Nicole L Spartano
  • Carla Wilson
  • Yiyi Zhang
  • Elizabeth C Oelsner

Abstract

Neighborhood factors, encompassing social, built, and natural environments, may explain geographic differences in the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on populations. Data from pre-existing national, population-based cohorts could be leveraged to better understand how pre-existing conditions (both individual and neighborhood) contribute to risk factor development and disease progression. We catalogued spatial and neighborhood data in the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R), comprising 14 diverse US cohorts (>50,000 participants). The C4R sample is generally spatially and socially representative of the overall nation, with C4R’s calculated spatial coverage representing 28% of US land area and 52% of the total US population. However, C4R (vs. non C4R) areas were more urban, wealthy, with more foreign-born residents, and less car-dependent with lower proportion employed and green. Twelve cohorts collected neighborhood characteristics – most commonly social environment data on neighborhood socioeconomic status– based on participants’ addresses. The most common built environment measures were related to food access, followed by other destination-based measures such as walkability. Natural environment data were available in the fewest cohorts, with emphasis on air quality or greenspace. This work provides clarity on available neighborhood and spatial data and facilitates future harmonization of data from C4R cohorts. Ultimately, this may enable future longitudinal and comparative analyses of neighborhood influences on COVID-19.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana A Hirsch & Lilah M Besser & Marcia Pescador Jimenez & Stephen T Dickinson & Talea Cornelius & Stephen T Francisco & Katherine Lawin & Hoda S Abdel Magid & Sandra S Albrecht & Norrina Bai Allen & , 2026. "Spatial and neighborhood data in the collaborative cohort of cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352170
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352170&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.