IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352089.html

Protocol for a Delphi consensus study to identify priority characteristics of integrated care for individuals with severe mental illness and comorbid physical disorders in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Touitou-Burckard
  • Tomasz Gondek
  • Ulker Isayeva
  • René Ernst Nielsen
  • Heidi Taipale
  • Jari Tiihonen
  • Laurent Boyer
  • Coralie Gandré
  • EU-MIND Consortium Collaborators

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) experience persistent and complex physical health needs that remain insufficiently addressed. While integrated care represents a promising solution, there is no consensus among stakeholders regarding what constitutes best-practice organizational models for this population. As part of the European Mental and Physical Health Initiative for People with Severe Mental Disorders (EU-MIND), this study aims to identify expert consensus on the key characteristics of integrated care models for individuals with SMI to support their sustainable implementation across Europe. Methods: This study will use an online Delphi process, with up to three rounds, to engage stakeholders from six European countries (Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Poland, and Sweden). Participants will include people living with SMI, their relatives, health and care professionals, public decision-makers and institutional actors with relevant experience related to the research topic. A minimum sample size of 33 participants per country will be targeted, with the aim of ensuring balanced representation across the different categories of participants. They will be asked to rate the importance of potential key characteristics of integrated care models using Likert scales. A characteristic will be considered to have reached consensus if more than 70% of the respondents agree on its degree of importance. This study complies with the Delphistar reporting guidelines for Delphi studies and has received ethical approval from the Aix-Marseille University Ethics Committee and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Discussion: This study will provide expert-based guidance on the core characteristics of integrated care for individuals living with SMI. By capturing diverse stakeholder perspectives across countries and healthcare systems, it will help define shared priorities and inform future service design, implementation and policy, supporting sustainable and context-sensitive care development in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Touitou-Burckard & Tomasz Gondek & Ulker Isayeva & René Ernst Nielsen & Heidi Taipale & Jari Tiihonen & Laurent Boyer & Coralie Gandré & EU-MIND Consortium Collaborators, 2026. "Protocol for a Delphi consensus study to identify priority characteristics of integrated care for individuals with severe mental illness and comorbid physical disorders in Europe," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352089
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352089&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.