IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351968.html

“The impact of COVID-19 on employee productivity and the future of remote work”

Author

Listed:
  • Sultan Alenazi
  • Jagannath Mohanty
  • Maheswaran Srinivasan
  • Durga Prasad Samontaray

Abstract

Purpose: This paper explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employee productivity and the future of remote work beyond the pandemic years. Using data collected from 646 remote workers, we examined the influence of interpersonal relations, time management, stress, and skill development on productivity. Design/methodology/approach: We validated our model using structural equation modelling (SEM), and the results revealed that the sudden shift to remote work had no significant negative impact on productivity. Findings: The results of this study may encourage HR managers to expand remote work opportunities, thereby enhancing talent attraction and retention in a highly competitive job market. Originality/value: Despite prevalent concerns about COVID-19 and the evolving nature of workplaces, employees perceived remote work as offering greater flexibility in task organization and the opportunity to create a healthier work-life balance. Furthermore, our findings suggest that HR managers should consider allowing remote work post-pandemic as a strategic aspect of workplace evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Sultan Alenazi & Jagannath Mohanty & Maheswaran Srinivasan & Durga Prasad Samontaray, 2026. "“The impact of COVID-19 on employee productivity and the future of remote work”," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351968
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351968
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351968&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.