IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346596.html

Referral to treatment times in the National Health Service of England: A five-year analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and socioeconomic deprivation and future implications for Ear, Nose and Throat service delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Spinos
  • Thomas Beech
  • Jonathan Lee
  • Christopher Coulson
  • Laura French
  • Sheila Greenfield
  • Ian Litchfield
  • Paul Nankivell
  • Richard Allen
  • Jameel Muzaffar

Abstract

Introduction: Referral-to-Treatment (RTT) waiting times are a critical indicator of healthcare system efficiency and equity. In England, Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) services are among the most affected, with over half of patients exceeding the 18-week National Health Service (NHS) target. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated pre-existing delays and regional disparities. This study evaluates RTT waiting time trends over five years and investigates the influence of socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity on these patterns. Methods: Data from the NHS covering August 2019–August 2024 were analysed across regions and Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). Population, ethnicity, and deprivation data were incorporated from governmental datasets. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including Spearman correlation, were used to assess associations between RTT metrics and deprivation, ethnicity, and regional variation. Results: The number of patients on ENT waiting lists doubled nationally, with a 22% patient population increase. The Midlands showed the highest growth in incomplete pathways. Despite short-term improvements post-COVID-19, national RTT compliance and median waiting times worsened. ICB-level data from 2021 onward revealed wide performance variation, but no statistically significant association to deprivation metrics, proportion of ethnic minorities or population differences. Trends in change over time also demonstrated no significant monotonic relationships. Discussion: Despite national evidence linking deprivation and ethnicity to healthcare inequalities, these associations were not observed at ICB level when it comes to median wait times, suggesting potential masking effects of geographic aggregation or unmeasured confounders. New policies promise opportunities for increase in the capacity of service delivery, but further investigations are required to safeguard the equitable access to such services. Conclusion: ENT services remain under significant strain, with limited recovery post-pandemic. Community-based NHS care models present new opportunities for ENT’s largely non-surgical management pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Spinos & Thomas Beech & Jonathan Lee & Christopher Coulson & Laura French & Sheila Greenfield & Ian Litchfield & Paul Nankivell & Richard Allen & Jameel Muzaffar, 2026. "Referral to treatment times in the National Health Service of England: A five-year analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and socioeconomic deprivation and future implications for Ear, Nose and Throat service delivery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346596
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346596
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346596&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilthorpe, Mark S. & Wilson, Richard C., 2003. "Rural/urban differences in the association between deprivation and healthcare utilisation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 2055-2063, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philibert, M.D. & Pampalon, R. & Hamel, D. & Thouez, J.-P. & Loiselle, C.G., 2007. "KW - Quebec: A local-scale evaluation system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 1651-1664, April.
    2. Burke, Amanda & Jones, Andy, 2019. "The development of an index of rural deprivation: A case study of Norfolk, England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 93-103.
    3. Enrico Ivaldi & Paolo Parra Saiani & Juan José Primosich & Carolina Bruzzi, 2020. "Health and Deprivation: A New Approach Applied to 32 Argentinian Urban Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 155-179, August.
    4. Stefano Landi & Enrico Ivaldi & Angela Testi, 2018. "Measuring Change Over Time in Socio-economic Deprivation and Health in an Urban Context: The Case Study of Genoa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 745-785, September.
    5. Havard, Sabrina & Deguen, Séverine & Bodin, Julie & Louis, Karine & Laurent, Olivier & Bard, Denis, 2008. "A small-area index of socioeconomic deprivation to capture health inequalities in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2007-2016, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.