IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346366.html

Choices and options in the care procurement process of bundled payment contracts: A literature-based overview from a payer’s perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sander Steenhuis
  • Jeroen van der Wolk
  • Eric van der Hijden

Abstract

Context: While the potential of bundled payment models to facilitate value-based care is hard to overestimate, the complexity of designing an effective and feasible care procurement contract forms a formidable barrier to their use. The objective of this study is to identify, structure, and interpret the key design choices and options during the care procurement process of bundled payment contracts using a payer’s perspective. Methods: Two reviewers independently conducted an iterative qualitative content analysis of a selectively sampled set of articles from a prior scoping review. First, they extracted and clustered all text excerpts about design choices or options relevant to a bundled payment procurement process. Where available, they assessed the potential impact of choosing that option. Second, the choices and options were analytically organized into six phases of a care procurement process. Third, the resulting framework was evaluated in an external expert panel session. Findings: 33 design choices with 110 unique options were identified and structured within a framework. An example of a design choice is to ‘determine the method to select care and cost to include in the bundle,’ in which case 4 options were identified: 1. based on historic claims data, 2. based on best-practices and/or local care pathways, 3. based on evidence-based clinical guidelines, and 4. based on the provider type or specialism that is willing to collaborate. Conclusions: This study helps understand how design choices for payers to purchase value-based care with bundled payment contracts are context-dependent (e.g., in a single-payer system options are different than in a multi-payer system), interchangeable (i.e., different choices can achieve similar effects) and/or interrelated (i.e., choosing one option can have a positive or negative impact on the options in other procurement phases). The framework assists payers (and providers) in developing an effective and feasible bundled payment contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander Steenhuis & Jeroen van der Wolk & Eric van der Hijden, 2026. "Choices and options in the care procurement process of bundled payment contracts: A literature-based overview from a payer’s perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-1, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346366
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346366
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346366&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.