IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345026.html

Adults’ leisure-time physical activity preferences and association with physical activity guidelines by metropolitan status, United States, 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Christiaan G Abildso
  • Eugene C Fitzhugh
  • Alan M Beck
  • Ashleigh Johnson
  • Dina L Maruca
  • Stefanie M Meyer
  • Cynthia K Perry
  • Carissa R Smock
  • Zachary Townsend
  • Lauren E Jacobs
  • M Renée Umstattd Meyer

Abstract

Background: Rural US adults experience disparities in meeting the physical activity guidelines (PAGs). Little is known about preferred types of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), nor their relationship with meeting the PAGs. This study aimed to identify the most prevalent LTPAs among US adults, the relationship between LTPA types and meeting PAGs, and how these differed by residential status. Methods: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study data were analyzed. Age-adjusted prevalence of 75 LTPAs and 11 categories of LTPAs that respondents spent the “most time” and “next most time” in during the previous month were compared by residential status (metropolitan; non-metropolitan). Logistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for a variety of factors were used to compare the prevalence of meeting aerobic-, muscle strengthening, and combined PAGs by residential status. Age-adjusted prevalence of meeting the combined PAGs by 11 LTPA categories was compared by metropolitan status. Results: Walking was the most prevalent LTPA (44.1%). Lawn/garden, hunting/fishing, household, farm/ranch work, childcare, and winter activities were more prevalent among non-metropolitan (rural) residents. Walking, running/jogging, weightlifting, conditioning, other activities, sports, bicycling, water activities, and dance were more prevalent among metropolitan (urban) residents. Non-metropolitan residents were less likely to meet the minimal aerobic-, muscle-strengthening, and combined PAGs, and were more likely to be inactive. Among adults that engaged in walking, roughly 25% met the combined PAGs and about 22% did not meet either PAG. Conclusions: When creating targeted rural PA interventions, LTPA preferences could be embraced and augmented or the non-preferred LTPAs could be adapted.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiaan G Abildso & Eugene C Fitzhugh & Alan M Beck & Ashleigh Johnson & Dina L Maruca & Stefanie M Meyer & Cynthia K Perry & Carissa R Smock & Zachary Townsend & Lauren E Jacobs & M Renée Umstattd, 2026. "Adults’ leisure-time physical activity preferences and association with physical activity guidelines by metropolitan status, United States, 2019," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345026
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345026&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farrigan, Tracey & Genetin, Brandon & Sanders, Austin & Pender, John & Thomas, Kelsey L. & Winkler, Richelle L. & Cromartie, John, 2024. "Rural America at a Glance: 2024 edition," Economic Information Bulletin 348093, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Liqing & Hrozencik, R.Aaron & Rouhi Rad, Mani & Uz, Dilek, 2026. "The impacts of depopulation and climate change on the cost of rural electric services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.