IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339127.html

Scarcity mindset’s positive association with using alternative financial services

Author

Listed:
  • George Rooney
  • Cäzilia Loibl

Abstract

The scarcity mindset, where people do not have what they feel that they need, can help consumers address the area of scarcity, but on the other hand can lead to neglect and mistakes elsewhere. This study tests whether a scarcity mindset is associated with the use of alternative financial services, whether the association is stable above and beyond established predictors of the use of alternative financial services, and whether it differs by household income. Data come from the 2021 FINRA National Financial Capability Study’s State-by-State survey wave, N = 24,349. Results of binary logistic regression analyses show that, controlling for established predictors of alternative financial services use and socio-demographic characteristics, a stronger scarcity mindset is significantly positively related to alternative financial services use. These findings hold for the pre-COVID-19 2018 data with regard to income groups, and although high-income respondent are lesser users of alternative financial services, the scarcity mindset transcends income status and emerges as a significant predictor of alternative financial services use for study participants regardless of household income. Study implications point to the need to assess the role of the scarcity mindset for newer alternative financial services products, including fintech applications. (192/300).

Suggested Citation

  • George Rooney & Cäzilia Loibl, 2026. "Scarcity mindset’s positive association with using alternative financial services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339127
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339127&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Rongxin & Lepori, Gabriele M. & Tai, Chung-Ching & Sung, Ming-Chien, 2022. "Explaining cryptocurrency returns: A prospect theory perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fieberg, Christian & Günther, Steffen & Poddig, Thorsten & Zaremba, Adam, 2024. "Non-standard errors in the cryptocurrency world," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. EOM, Cheoljun & EOM, Yunsung & PARK, Jong Won, 2024. "Intermediate cross-sectional prospect theory value in stock markets: A novel method," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Dobrynskaya, Victoria, 2024. "Is downside risk priced in cryptocurrency market?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Sadaqat, Mohsin & Butt, Hilal Anwar, 2023. "Stop-loss rules and momentum payoffs in cryptocurrencies," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Shaodong Zhou & Zilong Meng & Zhongwei Huang & Honghao Zhang & Danqi Wang, 2025. "A Hybrid Prospect–Regret Decision-Making Method for Green Supply Chain Management Under the Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Chen, Rongxin & Lepori, Gabriele M. & Tai, Chung-Ching & Sung, Ming-Chien, 2022. "Can salience theory explain investor behaviour? Real-world evidence from the cryptocurrency market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.