IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335597.html

Understanding the social dimensions of kidney care pathways: A scoping review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Reindolf Anokye
  • James Larkin
  • Abass Fehintola
  • Jessica Eustace-Cook
  • Rodrigo Martínez-Cadenas
  • Brett Duane
  • Bridget Johnston

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aims to map the social dimensions of kidney care pathways. Introduction: End-stage kidney disease places significant demands on patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and the broader healthcare system. Kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management are the common management pathways for end stage kidney disease, but its delivery entails substantial time, financial, and social costs. Research has documented some social aspects of kidney care pathways, but findings are fragmented across disciplines and have not been synthesised coherently. A scoping review is therefore needed to map the existing evidence, identify key domains of social impact, and highlight gaps to inform future research and policy. Method: Eligible studies will include primary research that reports on the social dimensions of managing end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in adults. Studies from all settings, involving relevant stakeholder groups including patients with end stage kidney disease, informal caregivers, healthcare staff, and Industrial and supply chain workers engaged in different roles associated with kidney replacement therapy and/or conservative kidney management, will be included. The review will follow JBI methodology. Peer-reviewed and grey literature will be identified through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SocINDEX, EconLit, Web of Science) and grey literature sources (including Google Scholar and organisational reports). Reference lists of relevant reviews and identified articles will also be screened to identify any other relevant articles. Two reviewers will independently screen records and extract data using a predefined form. Results will be synthesised narratively and presented in thematic and tabular formats. Discussion: This scoping review aims to generate evidence on the social impact of kidney replacement therapy and conservative management across multiple stakeholder groups. The review will provide a structured overview of how social outcomes are conceptualised, measured, and reported across the kidney care continuum. Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/63wpk.

Suggested Citation

  • Reindolf Anokye & James Larkin & Abass Fehintola & Jessica Eustace-Cook & Rodrigo Martínez-Cadenas & Brett Duane & Bridget Johnston, 2025. "Understanding the social dimensions of kidney care pathways: A scoping review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335597
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335597
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335597&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delautre, Guillaume., 2019. "Decent work in global supply chains an internal research review," ILO Working Papers 995043787902676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Richert & Marek Dudek, 2023. "Risk Mapping: Ranking and Analysis of Selected, Key Risk in Supply Chains," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Uma RANI & Damian GRIMSHAW, 2019. "Introduction: What does the future promise for work, employment and society?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 577-592, December.
    3. Margherita Pero & Elisa Arrigo & Antoinette Fionda-Douglas, 2020. "Sustainability in Fashion Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-4, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.