IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An appraisal of fund of funds efficiency based on risk-adjusted performance measures: Application of an augmented WASPAS methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Mostafa Shabani
  • Ali Khodarahmi
  • Rouzbeh Ghousi
  • Emran Mohammadi
  • Hossein Ghanbari

Abstract

In the complex landscape of investment management, Fund of Funds play a crucial role in constructing diversified portfolios with professional oversight. However, evaluating the performance of Fund of Funds is a challenging task due to their intricate management layers and diverse underlying assets. Traditional performance assessment methodologies often fall short in capturing these complexities, leading to potential inefficiencies in decision-making. This study addresses these challenges by applying a Multi-Attribute Decision Making approach, specifically an augmented Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment methodology, to provide a comprehensive appraisal of Fund of Fund performance. This study introduces an innovative modification to the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment methodology, addressing its inherent limitations and providing a more advanced evaluative framework. Despite its ability to offer a structured basis for decision-making, this approach has certain constraints, particularly in identifying the most influential performance criteria impacting outcomes. To resolve this issue, the proposed modification incorporates entropy measures and effective weighting techniques, thereby enhancing the robustness and precision of performance evaluation. This approach provides a sophisticated evaluative framework, facilitating investors in making informed decisions and optimizing investment strategies. This methodology was tested on a set of Iranian Fund of Funds, with computational results demonstrating the strong performance and robustness of the proposed approach. Among the alternatives evaluated, TMSK emerged as the best-performing fund, highlighting the effectiveness of the modified Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment method in facilitating informed investment decisions and optimizing portfolio strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mostafa Shabani & Ali Khodarahmi & Rouzbeh Ghousi & Emran Mohammadi & Hossein Ghanbari, 2025. "An appraisal of fund of funds efficiency based on risk-adjusted performance measures: Application of an augmented WASPAS methodology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314918
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314918
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314918&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Wolf & Dan Wunderli, 2009. "Fund-of-funds construction by statistical multiple testing methods," IEW - Working Papers 445, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    2. Andriy Bodnaruk & Bekhan Chokaev & Andrei Simonov, 2019. "Downside Risk Timing by Mutual Funds," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 171-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung‐Soon Shin & Minki Kim & Dongjun Oh & Tong Suk Kim, 2019. "Do hedge funds time market tail risk? Evidence from option‐implied tail risk," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 205-237, February.
    2. Jing Xie, 2024. "Stock-Picking by Mutual Funds: Evidence from Trading in Family-Controlled Firms," Working Papers 202411, University of Macau, Faculty of Business Administration.
    3. Manuel Ammann & Sebastian Fischer & Florian Weigert, 2018. "Risk Factor Exposure Variation and Mutual Fund Performance," Working Papers on Finance 1817, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised Nov 2018.
    4. Enareta Kurtbegu & Juliana Caicedo-llano, 2014. "European equity fund managers: luck or skill?!," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(4), pages 2340-2350.
    5. McDowell, Shaun, 2018. "The benefits of international diversification with weight constraints: A cross-country examination," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 99-109.
    6. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2019. "The power of (non-)linear shrinking: a review and guide to covariance matrix estimation," ECON - Working Papers 323, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Feb 2020.
    7. Farrukh Naveed & Muhammad Ishfaq & Zahid Maqbool, 2021. "The downside risk of mutual funds: Does the quality of corporate governance matter? Empirical evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 376-388, September.
    8. Sara Ali & Ihsan Badshah & Riza Demirer & Prasad Hegde, 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty and fund flow performance sensitivity: Evidence from New Zealand," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 666-679, September.
    9. Tim Jenkinson & Stefan Morkoetter & Thomas Wetzer, 2018. "Buy Low, Sell High? Do Private Equity Fund Managers Have Market Abilities?," Working Papers on Finance 1813, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.