IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connected multi-vehicle crash risk assessment considering probability and intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Shuo Jia
  • Jin Xu
  • Song Wang
  • Xingliang Liu

Abstract

Accurate driving risk assessments are essential in vehicle collision avoidance and traffic safety. The uncertainty in driving intentions and behavior, coupled with the difficulty in accurately predicting future trajectories of vehicles, poses challenges in assessing collision risk among vehicles. Existing research on collision risk assessment has been limited to focusing on pre-crashes (e.g., time-to-collision) and ignoring the impact of crash severity on risk. Research integrating pre- and post-crash is needed to assess the collision risk comprehensively. Therefore, the objective of this study was to propose an assessment model for collision risk in a vehicle-to-vehicle communication environment to achieve a more scientific assessment of driving risk by integrating probability (pre-crash) and intensity (post-crash). The proposed trajectory prediction model takes driving intentions into account and employs a social tensor pool to integrate interactions between vehicles, thereby achieving improved prediction accuracy. The likelihood of collision is obtained by analyzing the conflict relationship between the predicted and candidate trajectories of different vehicles. This study proposes a risk assessment model comprising two parts: one assesses the likelihood of collision by analyzing the conflicted relationship between predicted and candidate trajectories of different vehicles, and the other determines collision intensity through analysis of vehicle driving states. Finally, publicly available unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based traffic data are used to validate the models. The prediction errors of the proposed trajectory prediction model for three-second trajectories are 0.68 m and 1.34 for the root mean square error and negative log-likelihood, respectively. The quantitative experimental results illustrate that the proposed model outperforms existing models and can scientifically assess the risk of vehicle travel.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuo Jia & Jin Xu & Song Wang & Xingliang Liu, 2025. "Connected multi-vehicle crash risk assessment considering probability and intensity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313317
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313317
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313317&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.