Author
Listed:
- Ingrid Mogren
- Pham Thi Lan
- Ho Dang Phuc
- Sophia Holmlund
- Rhonda Small
- Joseph Ntaganira
- Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma
- Hussein Lesio Kidanto
- Matilda Ngarina
- Cecilia Bergström
Abstract
Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool in managing pregnancies and its use is increasing globally. However, the status of the pregnant woman and the fetus may vary in terms of clinical management, views in the community and legislation. To investigate the views and experiences of Vietnamese health professionals on maternal and fetal health interests, priority setting and potential conflicts, we conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire. Obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives and sonographers who manage pregnant women in maternity wards were invited to participate. We purposively chose public health facilities in the Hanoi region of Vietnam to obtain a representative sample. The final sample included 882 health professionals, of which 32.7% (n = 289) were obstetricians/gynecologists, 60.7% (n = 535) midwives and 6.6% (n = 58) sonographers. The majority of participants (60.3%) agreed that “The fetus is a person from the time of conception” and that maternal health interests should always be prioritised over fetal health interests in care provided (54.4%). 19.7% agreed that the fetus is never a patient, only the pregnant woman can be the patient, while 60.5% disagreed. Participants who performed ultrasounds were more likely to agree that fetal health interests are being given more weight in decision-making the further the gestation advances compared to those who did not perform ultrasounds (cOR 2.47, CI 1.27–4.79: n = 811). A significant proportion of health professionals in Vietnam assign the fetus the status of being a person, where personhood gradually evolves during pregnancy. While the fetus is often considered a patient with its own health interests, a majority of participants did give priority to maternal health interests. Health professionals appear to favour increased legal protection of the fetus. Strengthening the legal status of the fetus might have adverse implications for maternal autonomy. Measures to restrict maternal autonomy might require close observation to ensure that maternal reproductive rights are protected.
Suggested Citation
Ingrid Mogren & Pham Thi Lan & Ho Dang Phuc & Sophia Holmlund & Rhonda Small & Joseph Ntaganira & Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma & Hussein Lesio Kidanto & Matilda Ngarina & Cecilia Bergström, 2024.
"Vietnamese health professionals’ views on the status of the fetus and maternal and fetal health interests: A regional, cross-sectional study from the Hanoi area,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0310029
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310029
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Tautz, Siegrid & Jahn, Albrecht & Molokomme, Imelda & Görgen, Regina, 2000.
"Between fear and relief: how rural pregnant women experience foetal ultrasound in a Botswana district hospital,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 689-701, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0310029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.