IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Between fear and relief: how rural pregnant women experience foetal ultrasound in a Botswana district hospital

Listed author(s):
  • Tautz, Siegrid
  • Jahn, Albrecht
  • Molokomme, Imelda
  • Görgen, Regina
Registered author(s):

    Ultrasound technology has achieved almost universal coverage in industrialised countries with particular importance in antenatal surveillance. Its routine use has, however, been viewed critically from medical as well as from sociological perspectives. Studies on women's perception of ultrasound underline the crucial role of client-provider communication supporting the technical procedure. Ultrasound is now increasingly available in developing countries. Little is known about how clients in these settings perceive the technology. This study was concerned with women's experience of ultrasound scanning in an African district hospital setting and how their experience concurs with the health professionals' views about the new technology. The study was qualitative and used semi-structured in-depth interviews with 41 clients and structured non-participant observation of the examination process, as well as semistructured interviews with health staff. Most women viewed ultrasound as being beneficial. Some expressed considerable fear. The quality of client-provider interaction played a decisive role in how the procedure was perceived. Many statements, however, reflect women's overestimation of the diagnostic power of ultrasound and prenatal therapeutic possibilities. Technology and its often expatriate providers tend to be mystified and at the same time non-technological procedures provided by local staff in the context of normal history taking and antenatal care undervalued. Health staff expressed very positive views of ultrasound. They admitted, however, that since the availability of ultrasound they were tempted to take histories and physical examinations less thoroughly than before. Irrational expectations from the clients' side and unindicated overuse of ultrasound by health professionals may in the long run interact in a way that possibly undermines the quality and rational utilisation of antenatal care and respective referral guidelines. Indications for the use of ultrasound must be clearly specified within specific societal contexts and mechanism of ensuring adherence to these criteria be established. Communication with patients and appropriate information about the benefits and limitations of ultrasound are essential to alleviate fear, and to discourage irrational expectations and demand.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00321-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 50 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 5 (March)
    Pages: 689-701

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:5:p:689-701
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description

    Order Information: Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
    Web: http://www.elsevier.com/orderme/journalorderform.cws_home/315/journalorderform1/orderooc/id=654&ref=654_01_ooc_1&version=01

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:5:p:689-701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.