IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the prevalence of childhood adversity among university students in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jackie Hamilton
  • Alice Welham
  • Gareth Morgan
  • Christopher Jones

Abstract

Objectives: The focus of this review was to systematically review and meta-analyse the prevalence of ACEs among university students in the UK. Method: The systematic searching of six electronic databases (conducted February 2024) identified ten relevant articles (peer-reviewed articles of a quantitative nature that included ACE prevalence). PROSPERO reference: CRD42022364799. Results: Pooled prevalence for number of ACEs endured was 55.4% (95% CI: 32.4% - 78.4%; I2 > 99.5%) for one or more, and 31.6% (7.5% - 55.6%; I2 > 99.5%) for three or more. Pooled prevalence was: 15.9% (7.0% - 24.7%; I2 > 94.5%) for physical abuse; 27.0% (18.1% - 35.9%; I2 > 94.5%) for emotional abuse; 12.1% (5.2% - 19.0%; I2 > 94.5%) for sexual abuse; 8.4% (1.7% - 15.1%; I2 > 95.4%) for physical neglect, and 30.0% (21.5% - 38.5%; I2 > 95.4%) for emotional neglect. Pooled prevalence for household dysfunction categories were: 34.4% (22.8% - 46.0%) for parental separation; 18.4% (10.1% - 26.8%) for domestic violence; 35.2% (23.6% - 46.8%) for mental health difficulties; 21.4% (12.9% - 29.9%) for substance use; and 5.7% (2.3% - 9.1%) for incarceration (I2 > 88.8% for all household dysfunction items). Significant heterogeneity was observed between studies for most categories of adversity, and it was not possible to explain/reduce this variance by removing small numbers of influential/discrepant studies. Further analyses suggested potential influences of measurement tool used, country of data collection, and age and sex of participants. Conclusion: Results demonstrate considerable, largely unaccounted-for, heterogeneity in estimates of the prevalence of ACEs, impeding confidence in any summary statistics. Conclusions must be tentative due to analyses being underpowered given small numbers of papers, as well as potential confounds, meaning results may not be truly representative. However, results do suggest high prevalence rates which warrant further investigation, with appropriate support offered to students.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackie Hamilton & Alice Welham & Gareth Morgan & Christopher Jones, 2024. "Exploring the prevalence of childhood adversity among university students in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308038
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308038&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0227884 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hanlin Fu & Tiejian Feng & Jiabi Qin & Tingting Wang & Xiaobing Wu & Yumao Cai & Lina Lan & Tubao Yang, 2018. "Reported prevalence of childhood maltreatment among Chinese college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. McLafferty, M. & Bunting, B.P. & Armour, C. & Lapsley, C. & Ennis, E. & Murray, E. & O'Neill, S.M., 2020. "The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies on psychopathology and suicidal behaviour following negative childhood experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weizhen Zhan & Zhenwu You, 2024. "Family communication patterns, self-efficacy, and adolescent online prosocial behavior: a moderated mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Zi-Yu Wang & Ming Hu & Tao-Lin Yu & Jun Yang, 2019. "The Relationship between Childhood Maltreatment and Risky Sexual Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Mohammedhamid Osman Kelifa & Yinmei Yang & Herbert Carly & Wang Bo & Peigang Wang, 2021. "How Adverse Childhood Experiences Relate to Subjective Wellbeing in College Students: The Role of Resilience and Depression," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 2103-2123, June.
    4. Li, Bingbing & Pan, Yangu & Liu, Guangzeng & Chen, Wanfen & Lu, Jiamei & Li, Xu, 2020. "Perceived social support and self-esteem mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and psychosocial flourishing in Chinese undergraduate students," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Du, Xiaoli & Ding, Cody & Xiang, Guangcan & Duan, Huicun & Chen, Jiayu & Chen, Hong, 2024. "Mediation of expressive suppression and emotional well-being in the relationship between loneliness and mobile phone addiction among Chinese adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Chuk Ling Julian Lai & Daryl Yu Heng Lee & Monique On Yee Leung, 2020. "Childhood Adversities and Salivary Cortisol Responses to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Systematic Review of Studies Using the Children Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.