IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0307831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of patient engagement on patient safety in care transitions after cancer treatment: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Larissa Brust
  • Ingo Schmidt-Wolf
  • Matthias Weigl

Abstract

Background: Transitions of care after cancer treatment pose a major challenge for patient safety as adverse events and unplanned healthcare utilization occur frequently. At this point, patient and family engagement (PFE) is particularly valuable since patients and their families experience various challenges along this pathway, such as changing roles and recurrent needs to navigate across structural gaps between different services. However, there is currently a lack of evidence on the impact of PFE on patient safety in transitions after cancer treatment. Objective: To systematically review and synthesize evidence on effects of different PFE interventions on patient safety in the transition of care after cancer treatment. Methods: This protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis follows PRISMA-P guidelines. A comprehensive database search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and APA PsycInfo. Trial registries and grey literature will be searched, forward and backward citation tracking will be performed. Trials with prospective, longitudinal, interventional study designs will be included if they evaluate PFE interventions on patient safety outcomes (primary outcomes: healthcare utilization, patient harm, adherence, patient experience; secondary: quality of life, distress); eligible studies need to survey patients with any oncological disease during or after transition following cancer treatment. Results will be synthesized narratively and meta-analytically using a random-effects model. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 and revised JBI critical appraisal tool. The certainty of evidence will be judged according to the GRADE approach. Discussion: Robust evidence of effectiveness is needed to establish PFE interventions for patient safety in care transitions for oncological patients. This review will allow evidence-based conclusions about types and effects of different PFE interventions for transitional safety in oncology care and inform stakeholders in designing sustainable PFE activities. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024546938), OSF (doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9XAMU).

Suggested Citation

  • Larissa Brust & Ingo Schmidt-Wolf & Matthias Weigl, 2024. "The impact of patient engagement on patient safety in care transitions after cancer treatment: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307831
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307831&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0307831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Manafò & Lisa Petermann & Virginia Vandall-Walker & Ping Mason-Lai, 2018. "Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0179865 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Westerink, Henrike J. & Oirbans, Tom & Garvelink, Mirjam M. & van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F. & Zouitni, Ouisam & Bart, Hans A.J. & van der Wees, Philip J. & van der Nat, Paul B., 2023. "Barriers and facilitators of meaningful patient participation at the collective level in healthcare organizations: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Guendalina Graffigna & Serena Barello & Giuseppe Riva & Massimo Corbo & Gianfranco Damiani & Primiano Iannone & Albino Claudio Bosio & Walter Ricciardi, 2020. "Italian Consensus Statement on Patient Engagement in Chronic Care: Process and Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenza Capone & Roberta Borrelli & Leda Marino & Giovanni Schettino, 2022. "Mental Well-Being and Job Satisfaction of Hospital Physicians during COVID-19: Relationships with Efficacy Beliefs, Organizational Support, and Organizational Non-Technical Skills," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Angela Tolotti & Serena Barello & Camilla Vignaduzzo & Sarah Jayne Liptrott & Dario Valcarenghi & Tiziana Nania & Davide Sari & Loris Bonetti, 2022. "Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients’ and Nurses’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Federico Pennestrì & Giuseppe Banfi, 2022. "The Experience of Patients in Chronic Care Management: Applications in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Value for Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-8, August.
    4. Barbara Groot & Annyk Haveman & Mireille Buree & Ruud van Zuijlen & Juliette van Zuijlen & Tineke Abma, 2022. "What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Simone Harmsen & Carina A C M Pittens & Eva Vroonland & Annemiek J M L van Rensen & Jacqueline E W Broerse, 2022. "Supporting health researchers to realize meaningful patient involvement in research: Exploring researchers’ experiences and needs [New Requirements for Patient and Public Involvement Statements in ," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(5), pages 751-764.
    6. Razavi, S. Donya & Kapiriri, Lydia & Wilson, Michael & Abelson, Julia, 2020. "Applying priority-setting frameworks: A review of public and vulnerable populations’ participation in health-system priority setting," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 133-142.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.