IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priorities for quality of life after traumatic brain injury

Author

Listed:
  • Jasleen Grewal
  • Kix Citton
  • Geoff Sing
  • Janelle Breese Biagioni
  • Julia Schmidt

Abstract

Background: After traumatic brain injury (TBI), individuals can experience changes to quality of life (QOL). Despite understanding the factors that impact QOL after TBI, there is limited patient-oriented research to understand the subjective priorities for QOL after TBI. This study aims to understand the priorities for QOL after TBI using a group consensus building method. Methods: The Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts (TRIAGE) method was used to determine priorities for QOL after TBI. In phase one, expert participants were consulted to understand the context of QOL after TBI. In phase two, participants with TBI completed a questionnaire to broadly determine the factors that contributed to their QOL. In phase three, a portion of participants from phase two engaged in focus groups to identify the most relevant priorities. Data was analyzed thematically. In phase four, expert participants were consulted to finalize the priorities. Results: Phase one included three expert participants who outlined the complexity and importance of QOL after TBI. Phase two included 34 participants with TBI who described broad priorities for QOL including social support, employment, and accessible environments. Phase three included 13 participants with TBI who identified seven priorities for QOL: ensuring basic needs are met, participating in everyday life, trusting a circle of care, being seen and accepted, finding meaning in relationships, giving back and advocating, and finding purpose and value. In phase four, four expert participants confirmed the QOL priorities. Interpretations: Findings emphasize the critical need to address priorities for QOL after TBI to ensure improved health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasleen Grewal & Kix Citton & Geoff Sing & Janelle Breese Biagioni & Julia Schmidt, 2024. "Priorities for quality of life after traumatic brain injury," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306524
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306524
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306524&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Cummins, 2000. "Objective and Subjective Auality of Life: an Interactive Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 55-72, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn, 2013. "City Life: Rankings (Livability) Versus Perceptions (Satisfaction)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 433-451, January.
    2. Cheng, Wenyin & Ouyang, Xin & Yu, Anqi & Shen, Zhiyang & Vardanyan, Michael, 2024. "Subjective perceptions versus objective outcomes: Assessing the impact of smart city pilots on environmental quality in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Xiawei Chen & Ling Zhang & Zheyuan Zhao & Fengji Zhang & Shaojun Liu & Yi Long, 2023. "Characterizing and Measuring the Environmental Amenities of Urban Recreation Leisure Regions Based on Image and Text Fusion Perception: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Liangliang Liu & Donghong Ding & Jun He, 2019. "The welfare effects of fiscal decentralization: a simple model and evidence from China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 417-434, January.
    5. Tao Huang & Shihao Zhou & Xinyi Chen & Zhengsong Lin & Feng Gan, 2022. "Colour Preference and Healing in Digital Roaming Landscape: A Case Study of Mental Subhealth Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Kubiszewski, Ida & Zakariyya, Nabeeh & Costanza, Robert, 2018. "Objective and Subjective Indicators of Life Satisfaction in Australia: How Well Do People Perceive What Supports a Good Life?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 361-372.
    7. J. Broadbent & L. Hamilton & J. McGillivray, 2018. "Domain Compensation in Quality of Life of Individuals with Vasovagal Syncope: a Test of Homeostasis Theory," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 197-210, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.