IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305148.html

News source bias and sentiment on social media

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Knutson
  • Tiffany W Hsu
  • Michael Ko
  • Jeanne L Tsai

Abstract

As social media becomes a key channel for news consumption and sharing, proliferating partisan and mainstream news sources must increasingly compete for users’ attention. While affective qualities of news content may promote engagement, it is not clear whether news source bias influences affective content production or virality, or whether any differences have changed over time. We analyzed the sentiment of ~30 million posts (on twitter.com) from 182 U.S. news sources that ranged from extreme left to right bias over the course of a decade (2011–2020). Biased news sources (on both left and right) produced more high arousal negative affective content than balanced sources. High arousal negative content also increased reposting for biased versus balanced sources. The combination of increased prevalence and virality for high arousal negative affective content was not evident for other types of affective content. Over a decade, the virality of high arousal negative affective content also increased, particularly in balanced news sources, and in posts about politics. Together, these findings reveal that high arousal negative affective content may promote the spread of news from biased sources, and conversely imply that sentiment analysis tools might help social media users to counteract these trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Knutson & Tiffany W Hsu & Michael Ko & Jeanne L Tsai, 2024. "News source bias and sentiment on social media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305148
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305148
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305148&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. J. Crockett, 2017. "Moral outrage in the digital age," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(11), pages 769-771, November.
    2. Osmundsen, Mathias & Bor, Alexander & Vahlstrup, Peter Bjerregaard & Bechmann, Anja & Petersen, Michael Bang, 2021. "Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(3), pages 999-1015, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yulei & Cao, Dongmei & Hewitt, Michael & Shan, Shan, 2026. "Using large-language models to analyse social media engagement with the public sector communication on circular economy: Evidence from X," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Timmons, Shane & Whelan, Ava & Kelly, Clare, 2023. "An experimental test of a greenwashing inoculation intervention: Effects on identification, trust and intentions," Papers WP760, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    3. Mochon, Daniel & Schwartz, Janet, 2024. "The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Zeng, Jing & Brennen, Scott Babwah, 2023. "Misinformation," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20.
    5. Seth C. Lewis & Logan Molyneux, 2018. "A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 11-23.
    6. Joshua A. Confer & Allison M. Champ & Dorsa Amir & Hanna Schleihauf & Jan M. Engelmann, 2025. "Group membership biases children’s evaluation of evidence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Jacopo Marchetti & Antonio Mastrogiorgio, 2025. "Becoming fake: an evolutionary model of fake news," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 24(2), pages 929-945, December.
    8. François t'Serstevens & Roberto Cerina & Giulia Piccillo, 2024. "Mapping the Risk of Spreading Fake-News via Wisdom-of-the-Crowd & MrP," CESifo Working Paper Series 11138, CESifo.
    9. Yasushi Asako & Yoshio Kamijo & Daiki Kishishita & Masayuki Odora, 2026. "Fighting Fake News with Peer Feedback: Theory and Experiment," Working Papers 2531, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    10. Joseph M. Stubbersfield & Lewis G. Dean & Sana Sheikh & Kevin N. Laland & Catharine P. Cross, 2019. "Social transmission favours the ‘morally good’ over the ‘merely arousing’," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. James N. Druckman & Donald P. Green & Shanto Iyengar, 2023. "Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 708(1), pages 137-163, July.
    12. Virginia Small & James Warn, 2020. "Impacts on food policy from traditional and social media framing of moral outrage and cultural stereotypes," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(2), pages 295-309, June.
    13. Raúl Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, 2023. "An Overview of the Fake News Phenomenon: From Untruth-Driven to Post-Truth-Driven Approaches," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 15-29.
    14. Chung, Ji-Bum & Yeon, Dahye & Kim, Min-Kyu, 2023. "Characteristics of victim blaming related to COVID-19 in South Korea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    15. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile Internet and the Rise of Communitarian Politics," CESifo Working Paper Series 9955, CESifo.
    16. Juan S. Morales, Margaret Samahita, 2023. "Can Social Pressure Stifle Free Speech," LCERPA Working Papers bm0140, Laurier Centre for Economic Research and Policy Analysis.
    17. Jedicke, Eva Maria & Arnold, Christian & Lindenmeier, Jörg, 2025. "The dynamics of consumer boycott intention: Examining the roles of moral reasoning, cognitive dissonance, and self-congruence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Seth C. Lewis & Logan Molyneux, 2018. "A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 11-23.
    19. Persson, Emil & Tinghög, Gustav, 2024. "Repugnant markets and preferences in public," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Levi, Eugenio & Bayerlein, Michael & Grimalda, Gianluca & Reggiani, Tommaso G., 2025. "Narratives of Migration and Political Polarization: Private Preferences, Public Preferences and Social Media," IZA Discussion Papers 17749, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.