IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0302170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of temporary emigration on wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) detectability, with implications for abundance estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Allyson N Beard
  • Donald J Brown
  • Eric T Hileman
  • Michael T Jones
  • Jena M Staggs
  • Ron A Moen
  • Andrew F Badje
  • Christopher M Lituma

Abstract

Reliable population estimates are important for making informed management decisions about wildlife species. Standardized survey protocols have been developed for monitoring population trends of the wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta), a semi-aquatic freshwater turtle species of conservation concern throughout its distribution in east-central North America. The protocols use repeated active search surveys of defined areas, allowing for estimation of survey-specific detection probability (p) and site-specific abundance. These protocols assume population closure within the survey area during the survey period, which is unlikely to be met as wood turtles are a highly mobile species. Additionally, current protocols use a single-pass design that does not allow for separation of availability (pa) and detectability (pd). If there are systematic influences on pa or pd that are not accounted for in the survey design or data analysis, then resulting abundance estimates could be biased. The objectives of this study were to determine if pa is a random process and if pa and pd are influenced by demographic characteristics. We modified the wood turtle survey protocol used in the upper Midwest to include a double-pass design, allowing us to estimate pa and pd using a robust design capture-recapture model. The modified protocol was implemented at 14 wood turtle monitoring sites in Minnesota and Wisconsin between 2017 and 2022. Our results indicated that pa was non-random and that pd increased with turtle carapace length. Our study suggests that model assumptions for current wood turtle population models may be violated, likely resulting in an overestimation of abundance. We discuss possible protocol and modeling modifications that could result in more accurate wood turtle abundance estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Allyson N Beard & Donald J Brown & Eric T Hileman & Michael T Jones & Jena M Staggs & Ron A Moen & Andrew F Badje & Christopher M Lituma, 2024. "Influence of temporary emigration on wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) detectability, with implications for abundance estimation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302170
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302170&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0302170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William L. Kendall & Rhema Bjorkland, 2001. "Using Open Robust Design Models to Estimate Temporary Emigration from Capture—Recapture Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 1113-1122, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis, Emily B. & Kéry, Marc & Morgan, Byron J.T. & Coray, Armin & Schaub, Michael & Baur, Bruno, 2021. "Integrated modelling of insect population dynamics at two temporal scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    2. Joseph B Pfaller & Karen A Bjorndal & Milani Chaloupka & Kristina L Williams & Michael G Frick & Alan B Bolten, 2013. "Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-5, April.
    3. Roger Pradel & Rémi Choquet & Arnaud Béchet, 2012. "Breeding Experience Might Be a Major Determinant of Breeding Probability in Long-Lived Species: The Case of the Greater Flamingo," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Lanier, Wendy E. & Bailey, Larissa L. & Muths, Erin, 2016. "Integrating biology, field logistics, and simulations to optimize parameter estimation for imperiled species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 16-23.
    5. Ming Zhou & Rachel S. McCrea & Eleni Matechou & Diana J. Cole & Richard A. Griffiths, 2019. "Removal models accounting for temporary emigration," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 24-35, March.
    6. Murray G. Efford & Matthew R. Schofield, 2020. "A spatial open‐population capture‐recapture model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 392-402, June.
    7. Richard Huggins & Jakub Stoklosa & Cameron Roach & Paul Yip, 2018. "Estimating the size of an open population using sparse capture–recapture data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 280-288, March.
    8. Shirley Pledger & Edward Baker & Kim Scribner, 2013. "Breeding Return Times and Abundance in Capture–Recapture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 991-1001, December.
    9. Gimenez, Olivier & Lebreton, Jean-Dominique & Gaillard, Jean-Michel & Choquet, Rémi & Pradel, Roger, 2012. "Estimating demographic parameters using hidden process dynamic models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 307-316.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.