IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0301928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

WE economy: Potential of mutual aid distribution based on moral responsibility and risk vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Takeshi Kato

Abstract

Reducing wealth inequality is a global challenge that requires the transformation of the economic systems that produce inequality. The economic system comprises: (1) gifts and reciprocity, (2) power and redistribution, (3) market exchange, and (4) mutual aid without reciprocal obligations. Current inequality stems from a capitalist economy consisting of (2) and (3). To sublimate (1), the human economy, to (4), the concept of a “mixbiotic society” has been proposed in the philosophical realm. In this society, free and diverse individuals mix, recognize their respective “fundamental incapability,” and sublimate them into “WE” solidarity. Moreover, the economy must have a moral responsibility as a co-adventurer and consider its vulnerability to risk. This study focuses on two factors of mind perception—moral responsibility and risk vulnerability—and proposes a novel wealth distribution model between the two agents following an econophysical approach, whereas the conventional model dealt with redistribution through taxes and institutions. Three models are developed: a joint-venture model in which profit/losses are distributed based on their factors, a redistribution model in which wealth stocks are redistributed periodically based on their factors in the joint-venture model, and a “WE economy” model in which profit/losses are distributed based on the ratio of each other’s factors. A simulation comparison reveals that WE economies are effective in reducing inequality, resilient in normalizing wealth distribution as advantages, and susceptible to free riders as disadvantages. However, this disadvantage can be compensated for by fostering fellowship and using joint ventures. This study presents the effectiveness of moral responsibility and risk vulnerability, complementarity between the WE economy and joint economy, and the direction of the economy in reducing inequality. Future challenges include developing an advanced model based on real economic analysis and economic psychology and promoting its fieldwork for worker coops and platform cooperatives to realize a desirable mixbiotic society.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeshi Kato, 2024. "WE economy: Potential of mutual aid distribution based on moral responsibility and risk vulnerability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301928
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301928
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301928&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0301928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takeshi Kato & Yoshinori Hiroi, 2021. "Wealth disparities and economic flow: Assessment using an asset exchange model with the surplus stock of the wealthy," Papers 2108.07888, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    2. Arnab Chatterjee & Bikas K. Chakrabarti, 2007. "Kinetic Exchange Models for Income and Wealth Distributions," Papers 0709.1543, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2007.
    3. Takeshi Kato & Yoshinori Hiroi, 2021. "Wealth disparities and economic flow: Assessment using an asset exchange model with the surplus stock of the wealthy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Lima, Hugo & Vieira, Allan R. & Anteneodo, Celia, 2022. "Nonlinear redistribution of wealth from a stochastic approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Shane Frederick & George Loewenstein & Ted O'Donoghue, 2002. "Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 351-401, June.
    6. A. Chatterjee & B. K. Chakrabarti, 2007. "Kinetic exchange models for income and wealth distributions," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 60(2), pages 135-149, November.
    7. Yonatan Berman & Eshel Ben-Jacob & Yoash Shapira, 2016. "The Dynamics of Wealth Inequality and the Effect of Income Distribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takeshi Kato, 2023. "WE economy: Potential of mutual aid distribution based on moral responsibility and risk vulnerability," Papers 2312.06927, arXiv.org.
    2. Takeshi Kato, 2022. "Wealth Redistribution and Mutual Aid: Comparison using Equivalent/Nonequivalent Exchange Models of Econophysics," Papers 2301.00091, arXiv.org.
    3. Max Greenberg & H. Oliver Gao, 2024. "Twenty-five years of random asset exchange modeling," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(6), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Takeshi Kato, 2022. "Islamic and capitalist economies: Comparison using econophysics models of wealth exchange and redistribution," Papers 2206.05443, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    5. Berman, Yonatan & Aste, Tomaso, 2016. "To what extent does immigration affect inequality?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 1029-1039.
    6. Takeshi Kato & Yosuke Tanabe & Mohammad Rezoanul Hoque, 2024. "Wealth inequality and utility: Effect evaluation of redistribution and consumption morals using the macro-econophysical coupled approach," Papers 2405.13341, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    7. Sokolov, Andrey & Melatos, Andrew & Kieu, Tien, 2010. "Laplace transform analysis of a multiplicative asset transfer model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(14), pages 2782-2792.
    8. Costas Efthimiou & Adam Wearne, 2016. "Household Income Distribution in the USA," Papers 1602.06234, arXiv.org.
    9. Thitithep Sitthiyot & Kanyarat Holasut, 2024. "Income distribution in Thailand is scale-invariant," Papers 2402.01141, arXiv.org.
    10. Maria Letizia Bertotti & Amit K Chattopadhyay & Giovanni Modanese, 2017. "Economic inequality and mobility for stochastic models with multiplicative noise," Papers 1702.08391, arXiv.org.
    11. Fix, Blair, 2017. "Evidence for a Power Theory of Personal Income Distribution," Working Papers on Capital as Power 2017/03, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism.
    12. Cui, Jian & Pan, Qiuhui & Qian, Qian & He, Mingfeng & Sun, Qilin, 2013. "A multi-agent dynamic model based on different kinds of bequests," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1393-1397.
    13. Chatterjee, Arnab & Chakrabarti, Anindya S. & Ghosh, Asim & Chakraborti, Anirban & Nandi, Tushar K., 2016. "Invariant features of spatial inequality in consumption: The case of India," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 169-181.
    14. Blair Fix, 2018. "Hierarchy and the power-law income distribution tail," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 471-491, September.
    15. Chakrabarti, Anindya S., 2011. "An almost linear stochastic map related to the particle system models of social sciences," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4370-4378.
    16. Takeshi Kato & Yasuyuki Kudo & Hiroyuki Mizuno & Yoshinori Hiroi, 2020. "Regional Inequality Simulations Based on Asset Exchange Models with Exchange Range and Local Support Bias," Papers 2002.09272, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    17. Kausik Gangopadhyay, 2017. "A Survey into Evidence of Zipf’s Law among Indian Socio-Economic Variables," Working papers 223, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    18. Ghosh, Asim & Chatterjee, Arnab & Inoue, Jun-ichi & Chakrabarti, Bikas K., 2016. "Inequality measures in kinetic exchange models of wealth distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 465-474.
    19. Pavel Exner & Petr v{S}eba, 2007. "A Markov process associated with plot-size distribution in Czech Land Registry and its number-theoretic properties," Papers 0711.1836, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2007.
    20. Willis, Geoff, 2011. "Why money trickles up – wealth & income distributions," MPRA Paper 30851, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.