IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0300763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cervical cancer screening knowledge and associated factors among Eswatini women: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Phinda G Khumalo
  • Mariko Carey
  • Lisa Mackenzie
  • Rob Sanson-Fisher

Abstract

Background: Over recent years, cervical cancer incidence and related mortality have steadily increased in Eswatini. Low cervical cancer screening uptake partly explains the situation. Cervical cancer screening-related knowledge is positively associated with screening uptake. Little is known about women’s cervical cancer screening-related knowledge in Eswatini. Objective: This study aimed to assess cervical cancer screening knowledge and associated factors among Eswatini women eligible for screening. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving three hundred and seventy-seven women aged 25 to 59 selected from four primary healthcare clinics in Eswatini was conducted. A paper and pen survey assessed knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, benefits of screening, the meaning of screening results, recommended screening intervals, and socio-demographics. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. Linear regression was applied to examine associations between cervical cancer screening-related knowledge and participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Two hundred and twenty-nine (61%) participants answered 80% or more knowledge questions correctly. Compared to HIV-positive participants, HIV-negative participants had 0.61 times lower cervical cancer screening knowledge scores (β = -0.39, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.19, p = 0.03). Participants who travelled more than 30 minutes to the clinic had 0.3 times lower cervical cancer screening knowledge scores (β = -0.70, 95% CI: -1.15, -0.25, p

Suggested Citation

  • Phinda G Khumalo & Mariko Carey & Lisa Mackenzie & Rob Sanson-Fisher, 2024. "Cervical cancer screening knowledge and associated factors among Eswatini women: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300763
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300763
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300763&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0300763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melaku Desta & Temesgen Getaneh & Bewuket Yeserah & Yichalem Worku & Tewodros Eshete & Molla Yigzaw Birhanu & Getachew Mullu Kassa & Fentahun Adane & Yordanos Gizachew Yeshitila, 2021. "Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.