IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0296468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress appraisal in the workplace and its associations with productivity and mood: Insights from a multimodal machine learning analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad Awada
  • Burcin Becerik Gerber
  • Gale M Lucas
  • Shawn C Roll

Abstract

Previous studies have primarily focused on predicting stress arousal, encompassing physiological, behavioral, and psychological responses to stressors, while neglecting the examination of stress appraisal. Stress appraisal involves the cognitive evaluation of a situation as stressful or non-stressful, and as a threat/pressure or a challenge/opportunity. In this study, we investigated several research questions related to the association between states of stress appraisal (i.e., boredom, eustress, coexisting eustress-distress, distress) and various factors such as stress levels, mood, productivity, physiological and behavioral responses, as well as the most effective ML algorithms and data signals for predicting stress appraisal. The results support the Yerkes-Dodson law, showing that a moderate stress level is associated with increased productivity and positive mood, while low and high levels of stress are related to decreased productivity and negative mood, with distress overpowering eustress when they coexist. Changes in stress appraisal relative to physiological and behavioral features were examined through the lenses of stress arousal, activity engagement, and performance. An XGBOOST model achieved the best prediction accuracies of stress appraisal, reaching 82.78% when combining physiological and behavioral features and 79.55% using only the physiological dataset. The small accuracy difference of 3% indicates that physiological data alone may be adequate to accurately predict stress appraisal, and the feature importance results identified electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and blood volume pulse as the most useful physiologic features. Implementing these models within work environments can serve as a foundation for designing workplace policies, practices, and stress management strategies that prioritize the promotion of eustress while reducing distress and boredom. Such efforts can foster a supportive work environment to enhance employee well-being and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad Awada & Burcin Becerik Gerber & Gale M Lucas & Shawn C Roll, 2024. "Stress appraisal in the workplace and its associations with productivity and mood: Insights from a multimodal machine learning analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296468
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296468
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296468&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0296468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annamaria Di Fabio & José María Peiró & Isabel Rodríguez & Malgorzata Wanda Kozusznik, 2018. "The Valencia Eustress-Distress Appraisal Scale (VEDAS): Validation of the Italian Version," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Bharti Venkatesh & Nidhi Ram, 2015. "Eustress : A Unique Dimension To Stress Management," Working papers 2015-09-10, Voice of Research.
    3. Yu Zhang & Ershi Qi, 2022. "Happy work: Improving enterprise human resource management by predicting workers’ stress using deep learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annamaria Di Fabio & Donald H. Saklofske, 2019. "Positive Relational Management for Sustainable Development: Beyond Personality Traits—The Contribution of Emotional Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Hui Zhang, 2023. "Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and quantitative weight analysis in structure management of human resources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2019. "Unsustainable Working Conditions: The Association of Destructive Leadership, Use of Technology, and Workload with Workaholism and Exhaustion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Ana M. Tur-Porcar & Noemí Cuartero-Monteagudo & Julio Fernández-Garrido, 2019. "Learning Environments in Health and Medical Studies: The Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Sathya Rashmi GURUGE & Joowon BAN, 2021. "Analysing the Impact of Occupational Stress on Employee Performance: A Case Study on Hayleys Plantations and Tea Export PLC in Sri Lanka," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 26-37, November.
    6. Marianna Giunchi & Anne-Marie Vonthron & Chiara Ghislieri, 2019. "Perceived Job Insecurity and Sustainable Wellbeing: Do Coping Strategies Help?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0296468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.