IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0283815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Brown
  • Naheed Ahmed
  • Matthew Biel
  • Loral Patchen
  • Janine Rethy
  • Angela Thomas
  • Hannah Arem

Abstract

Background: The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities. Methods: We conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs. Results: We found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings. Conclusion: Despite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Brown & Naheed Ahmed & Matthew Biel & Loral Patchen & Janine Rethy & Angela Thomas & Hannah Arem, 2023. "Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283815
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0283815&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0283815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauren A Taylor & Annabel Xulin Tan & Caitlin E Coyle & Chima Ndumele & Erika Rogan & Maureen Canavan & Leslie A Curry & Elizabeth H Bradley, 2016. "Leveraging the Social Determinants of Health: What Works?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Ohki & Yuichi Ikeda & Susumu Kunisawa & Yuichi Imanaka, 2022. "Regional medical inter-institutional cooperation in medical provider network constructed using patient claims data from Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Sharon Anderson & Jasneet Parmar & Tanya L’Heureux & Bonnie Dobbs & Lesley Charles & Peter George J. Tian, 2022. "Family Caregiving during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: A Mediation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Piroddi, Roberta & Downing, Jennifer & Duckworth, Helen & Barr, Benjamin, 2022. "The impact of an integrated care intervention on mortality and unplanned hospital admissions in a disadvantaged community in England: A difference-in-differences study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(6), pages 549-557.
    4. Julia M. Goodman & Janne Boone-Heinonen & Dawn M. Richardson & Sarah B. Andrea & Lynne C. Messer, 2018. "Analyzing Policies Through a DOHaD Lens: What Can We Learn?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Nicolás E. Barceló & Enrico G. Castillo & Roya Ijadi-Maghsoodi & Nichole Goodsmith & Lingqi Tang & David Okikawa & Felica Jones & Pluscedia Williams & Christopher Benitez & Bowen Chung & Kenneth B. We, 2022. "Multi-Sector Assessment and Client-Perception of Social Need at Long-Term Follow-Up of a Group-Randomized Trial of Community-Engaged Collaborative Care for Adults with Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Cory Bolkan & Raven H. Weaver & Eunsaem Kim & Bidisha Mandal, 2022. "Regional Planning for Aging in Place: Older Adults' Perceptions of Needs and Awareness of Aging Services in Washington State," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 161-192, March.
    7. Amy McQueen & David von Nordheim & Charlene Caburnay & Linda Li & Cynthia Herrick & Lauren Grimes & Darrell Broussard & Rachel E. Smith & Dana Lawson & Yan Yan & Matthew Kreuter, 2024. "A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of a Social Needs Navigation Intervention on Health Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization among Medicaid Members with Type 2 Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Eugene Seo & Sanghee Lee, 2023. "Implications of Aging in Place in the Context of the Residential Environment: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-30, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.