IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280399.html

Proteomics biomarker discovery for individualized prevention of familial pancreatic cancer using statistical learning

Author

Listed:
  • Chung Shing Rex Ha
  • Martina Müller-Nurasyid
  • Agnese Petrera
  • Stefanie M Hauck
  • Federico Marini
  • Detlef K Bartsch
  • Emily P Slater
  • Konstantin Strauch

Abstract

Background: The low five-year survival rate of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the low diagnostic rate of early-stage PDAC via imaging highlight the need to discover novel biomarkers and improve the current screening procedures for early diagnosis. Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) describes the cases of PDAC that are present in two or more individuals within a circle of first-degree relatives. Using innovative high-throughput proteomics, we were able to quantify the protein profiles of individuals at risk from FPC families in different potential pre-cancer stages. However, the high-dimensional proteomics data structure challenges the use of traditional statistical analysis tools. Hence, we applied advanced statistical learning methods to enhance the analysis and improve the results’ interpretability. Methods: We applied model-based gradient boosting and adaptive lasso to deal with the small, unbalanced study design via simultaneous variable selection and model fitting. In addition, we used stability selection to identify a stable subset of selected biomarkers and, as a result, obtain even more interpretable results. In each step, we compared the performance of the different analytical pipelines and validated our approaches via simulation scenarios. Results: In the simulation study, model-based gradient boosting showed a more accurate prediction performance in the small, unbalanced, and high-dimensional datasets than adaptive lasso and could identify more relevant variables. Furthermore, using model-based gradient boosting, we discovered a subset of promising serum biomarkers that may potentially improve the current screening procedure of FPC. Conclusion: Advanced statistical learning methods helped us overcome the shortcomings of an unbalanced study design in a valuable clinical dataset. The discovered serum biomarkers provide us with a clear direction for further investigations and more precise clinical hypotheses regarding the development of FPC and optimal strategies for its early detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung Shing Rex Ha & Martina Müller-Nurasyid & Agnese Petrera & Stefanie M Hauck & Federico Marini & Detlef K Bartsch & Emily P Slater & Konstantin Strauch, 2023. "Proteomics biomarker discovery for individualized prevention of familial pancreatic cancer using statistical learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280399
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280399
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280399&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. Benjamin Hofner & Andreas Mayr & Nikolay Robinzonov & Matthias Schmid, 2014. "Model-based boosting in R: a hands-on tutorial using the R package mboost," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 3-35, February.
    3. Rajen D. Shah & Richard J. Samworth, 2013. "Variable selection with error control: another look at stability selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(1), pages 55-80, January.
    4. Alvin P. Makohon-Moore & Karen Matsukuma & Ming Zhang & Johannes G. Reiter & Jeffrey M. Gerold & Yuchen Jiao & Lisa Sikkema & Marc A. Attiyeh & Shinichi Yachida & Corinne Sandone & Ralph H. Hruban & D, 2018. "Precancerous neoplastic cells can move through the pancreatic ductal system," Nature, Nature, vol. 561(7722), pages 201-205, September.
    5. Xinjian Liu & Xuhui Bao & Mengjie Hu & Hanman Chang & Meng Jiao & Jin Cheng & Liyi Xie & Qian Huang & Fang Li & Chuan-Yuan Li, 2020. "Inhibition of PCSK9 potentiates immune checkpoint therapy for cancer," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7839), pages 693-698, December.
    6. Alexander Kirpich & Elizabeth A Ainsworth & Jessica M Wedow & Jeremy R B Newman & George Michailidis & Lauren M McIntyre, 2018. "Variable selection in omics data: A practical evaluation of small sample sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tino Werner, 2025. "Loss-guided stability selection," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 19(1), pages 5-30, March.
    2. Capanu, Marinela & Giurcanu, Mihai & Begg, Colin B. & Gönen, Mithat, 2023. "Subsampling based variable selection for generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Michael Balzer & Adhen Benlahlou, 2025. "Mitigating consequences of prestige in citations of publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(11), pages 6035-6062, November.
    5. Juan Torres Munguía, 2024. "Identifying Gender-Specific Risk Factors for Income Poverty across Poverty Levels in Urban Mexico: A Model-Based Boosting Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Michael Balzer & Elisabeth Bergherr & Swen Hutter & Tobias Hepp, 2026. "Gradient boosting for Dirichlet regression models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 110(1), pages 149-189, March.
    7. Claude Renaux & Laura Buzdugan & Markus Kalisch & Peter Bühlmann, 2020. "Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-40, March.
    8. Juan Armando Torres Munguía, 2024. "A model-based boosting approach to risk factors for physical intimate partner violence against women and girls in Mexico," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1937-1963, October.
    9. Panxu Yuan & Yinfei Kong & Gaorong Li, 2024. "FDR control and power analysis for high-dimensional logistic regression via StabKoff," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(5), pages 2719-2749, July.
    10. Xiangyu Wang & Chenlei Leng, 2016. "High dimensional ordinary least squares projection for screening variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(3), pages 589-611, June.
    11. Khurram Nadeem & Mehdi-Abderrahman Jabri, 2023. "Stable variable ranking and selection in regularized logistic regression for severely imbalanced big binary data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    13. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    14. Xu, Yang & Zhao, Shishun & Hu, Tao & Sun, Jianguo, 2021. "Variable selection for generalized odds rate mixture cure models with interval-censored failure time data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Emmanouil Androulakis & Christos Koukouvinos & Kalliopi Mylona & Filia Vonta, 2010. "A real survival analysis application via variable selection methods for Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1399-1406.
    16. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Yiping Yang & Peixin Zhao & Dongsheng Wu, 2025. "Robust variable selection with exponential squared loss for linear mixed-effects models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 88(6), pages 1023-1049, August.
    18. Ying Huang & Shibasish Dasgupta, 2019. "Likelihood-Based Methods for Assessing Principal Surrogate Endpoints in Vaccine Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 504-523, December.
    19. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    20. Ni, Xiao & Zhang, Hao Helen & Zhang, Daowen, 2009. "Automatic model selection for partially linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 2100-2111, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.