IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0275228.html

Music we move to: Spotify audio features and reasons for listening

Author

Listed:
  • Deniz Duman
  • Pedro Neto
  • Anastasios Mavrolampados
  • Petri Toiviainen
  • Geoff Luck

Abstract

Previous literature has shown that music preferences (and thus preferred musical features) differ depending on the listening context and reasons for listening (RL). Yet, to our knowledge no research has investigated how features of music that people dance or move to relate to particular RL. Consequently, in two online surveys, participants (N = 173) were asked to name songs they move to (“dance music”). Additionally, participants (N = 105) from Survey 1 provided RL for their selected songs. To investigate relationships between the two, we first extracted audio features from dance music using the Spotify API and compared those features with a baseline dataset that is considered to represent music in general. Analyses revealed that, compared to the baseline, the dance music dataset had significantly higher levels of energy, danceability, valence, and loudness, and lower speechiness, instrumentalness and acousticness. Second, to identify potential subgroups of dance music, a cluster analysis was performed on its Spotify audio features. Results of this cluster analysis suggested five subgroups of dance music with varying combinations of Spotify audio features: “fast-lyrical”, “sad-instrumental”, “soft-acoustic”, “sad-energy”, and “happy-energy”. Third, a factor analysis revealed three main RL categories: “achieving self-awareness”, “regulation of arousal and mood”, and “expression of social relatedness”. Finally, we identified variations in people’s RL ratings for each subgroup of dance music. This suggests that certain characteristics of dance music are more suitable for listeners’ particular RL, which shape their music preferences. Importantly, the highest-rated RL items for dance music belonged to the “regulation of mood and arousal” category. This might be interpreted as the main function of dance music. We hope that future research will elaborate on connections between musical qualities of dance music and particular music listening functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Deniz Duman & Pedro Neto & Anastasios Mavrolampados & Petri Toiviainen & Geoff Luck, 2022. "Music we move to: Spotify audio features and reasons for listening," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0275228
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0275228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0275228&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0275228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peres-Neto, Pedro R. & Jackson, Donald A. & Somers, Keith M., 2005. "How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 974-997, June.
    2. Minsu Park & Jennifer Thom & Sarah Mennicken & Henriette Cramer & Michael Macy, 2019. "Global music streaming data reveal diurnal and seasonal patterns of affective preference," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(3), pages 230-236, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Morana, 2014. "Factor Vector Autoregressive Estimation of Heteroskedastic Persistent and Non Persistent Processes Subject to Structural Breaks," Working Papers 273, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2014.
    2. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    3. Joy R. Petway & Yu-Pin Lin & Rainer F. Wunderlich, 2019. "Analyzing Opinions on Sustainable Agriculture: Toward Increasing Farmer Knowledge of Organic Practices in Taiwan-Yuanli Township," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Jonas Eberle & Renier Myburgh & Dirk Ahrens, 2014. "The Evolution of Morphospace in Phytophagous Scarab Chafers: No Competition - No Divergence?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Johann Fuchs & Doris Söhnlein & Brigitte Weber & Enzo Weber, 2018. "Stochastic Forecasting of Labor Supply and Population: An Integrated Model," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(1), pages 33-58, February.
    6. Marco Dueñas & Antoine Mandel, 2023. "The structure of global cultural networks: Evidence from the diffusion of music videos," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Hauck, Jana & Suess-Reyes, Julia & Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Frank, Hermann, 2016. "Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER Scale," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 133-148.
    8. Jin Guo & Xiaojian Wei & Fuqing Zhang & Yubo Ding, 2025. "Coupled Assessment of Land Use Changes and Ecological Benefits Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Volker G. Kuppelwieser & Aleksa-Carina Putinas & Marina Bastounis, 2019. "Toward Application and Testing of Measurement Scales and an Example," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(2), pages 326-349, May.
    10. Susumu Nagayama & Hitoshi Mitsuhashi, 2022. "Explosive and implosive root concepts: An analysis of music moods rooted by two influential rap artists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Carla de Oliveira Leite Nascimento & Paulo Renato de Sousa & Paulo Tarso Vilela de Resende & Francisco Gildemir Ferreira da Silva, 2019. "Transport Service Provider Perception of Barriers and Urban Freight Policies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Ard H. J. den Reijer & Pieter W. Otter & Jan P. A. M. Jacobs, 2024. "An heuristic scree plot criterion for the number of factors," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3991-4000, August.
    13. Antonio Pica & Bartolomeo Schirone & Sara Magrini & Paolo Laghi & Kevin Cianfaglione & Alfredo Di Filippo, 2025. "Naturalness and Tree Composition Determine the Abundance of Rare and Threatened Orchids in Mature and Old-Growth Abies alba Forests in the Northern Apennines (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, March.
    14. David Juárez-Varón & Victoria Tur-Viñes & Alejandro Rabasa-Dolado & Kristina Polotskaya, 2020. "An Adaptive Machine Learning Methodology Applied to Neuromarketing Analysis: Prediction of Consumer Behaviour Regarding the Key Elements of the Packaging Design of an Educational Toy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Gang Li & Chu Zhang, 2010. "On the Number of State Variables in Options Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 2058-2075, November.
    16. Edoardo Saccenti & Marieke E. Timmerman, 2017. "Considering Horn’s Parallel Analysis from a Random Matrix Theory Point of View," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 186-209, March.
    17. repec:jss:jstsof:46:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Dray, Stephane, 2008. "On the number of principal components: A test of dimensionality based on measurements of similarity between matrices," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2228-2237, January.
    19. repec:dgr:rugsom:14008-eef is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Psaradakis, Zacharias & Vávra, Marián, 2014. "On testing for nonlinearity in multivariate time series," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 1-4.
    21. Bauer, Jan O. & Drabant, Bernhard, 2021. "Principal loading analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    22. repec:plo:pone00:0113905 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Qingyong Wang & Hong-Ning Dai & Hao Wang, 2017. "A Smart MCDM Framework to Evaluate the Impact of Air Pollution on City Sustainability: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0275228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.