IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0270207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Zoom or not to Zoom: A longitudinal study of UK population’s activities during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Lan Li
  • Ava Sullivan
  • Anwar Musah
  • Katerina Stavrianaki
  • Caroline E Wood
  • Philip Baker
  • Patty Kostkova

Abstract

This longitudinal study determines the frequency and way of people doing activities from Spring 2020 to Summer 2021 during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Six online surveys were carried out between April 2020 and July 2021. 4,992 participants were engaged in the cross-sectional study and 203 participants who provided repeat responses were included in the subset sample of prospective cohort analysis. Primary outcomes measured were the frequency and the mode of doing the activities (online or in-person) across sixteen selected activity groups, as defined by the UK National Time Use Survey. The results show that cultural activities, spending time with others, and travelling, were the activities with the largest proportions of frequency and mode changes. The most significant changes occurred from March to June 2020, a period that included the first lockdown. Survey results from this period show a significant decrease among most of the sixteen measured activities. From March to October 2020, a period which spans the first lockdown and its subsequent ease of restrictions, showed the most significant shift from accessing activities in-person to online. Despite ‘Freedom Day’, the July 19th 2021 date in which all restrictions were abolished, it was found that people do cultural activities and group activities at a significantly lower frequency than before the pandemic. In addition, despite a lack of restrictions after this date, more than half of participants access many activities, such as spending time with others, shopping, work and studying, online or hybrid. This study provides an invaluable insight into understanding how people in the UK changed their lifestyle, including what activities they do, and how they accessed those activities in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health policy implemented to address the pandemic. These results may serve as unique evidence for policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan Li & Ava Sullivan & Anwar Musah & Katerina Stavrianaki & Caroline E Wood & Philip Baker & Patty Kostkova, 2022. "To Zoom or not to Zoom: A longitudinal study of UK population’s activities during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270207
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270207&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0270207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janine Hacker & Jan vom Brocke & Joshua Handali & Markus Otto & Johannes Schneider, 2020. "Virtually in this together – how web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the COVID-19 crisis," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 563-584, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Thomas Falk & Eva Hagsten, 2023. "Reverse adoption of information and communication technology among organisers of academic conferences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1963-1985, March.
    2. Olt, Christian M. & Hendriks, Patrick & Sturm, Timo & Moos, Clara C., 2024. "From Avatars to Allies: Exploring Team Collaboration in the Metaverse," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 141899, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Gutierrez-Lythgoe, Antonio, 2023. "Teletrabajo en Twitter: Análisis mediante Deep Learning [Teleworking on Twitter: Analysis using Deep Learning]," MPRA Paper 117101, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Marie-E. Godefroid & Vincent Borghoff & Ralf Plattfaut & Björn Niehaves, 2024. "Teleworking antecedents: an exploration into availability bias as an impediment," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 247-284, June.
    5. Matsuo, Miwa & Gaydarska, Hristina, 2023. "Do ICT development and internet use decrease intra-regional work-related travel?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Michael Gau & Anke Greif-Winzrieth & Alexander Maedche & Christof Weinhardt & Jan Brocke, 2025. "Engaging citizen scientists: designing an open research system for collaborative problem exploration," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.