IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0268406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using social and sexual networking mobile applications to promote HIV testing, medical care and prevention services among Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County, California, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Frank H Galvan
  • Honghu Liu
  • Ronald A Brooks
  • Ying-Tung Chen
  • Ricardo Mendoza Lepe

Abstract

HIV disproportionately affects Latinos versus Whites, with Latinos having higher rates of HIV. Additionally, many HIV-positive Latinos are unaware of their infection. Proyecto Protégete, an HIV prevention intervention developed for Latino men who have sex with men (MSM), used social and sexual networking mobile applications (apps) to recruit individuals for HIV testing and linkage to medical care and prevention services. This study occurred in Los Angeles County, California, USA from December 18, 2015 to April 22, 2017. The study’s primary aim was to assess Proyecto Protégete‘s ability to successfully recruit Latino MSM involved in high-risk sexual activities. A secondary aim was to evaluate its capacity to promote HIV testing and linkage to HIV medical care and prevention services among this population by comparing it to two programs with similar samples. Comparisons using Fisher’s Exact Test were conducted between Proyecto Protégete and the HIV testing program of the agency in which Proyecto Protégete was located and the County-funded HIV testing programs to compare the samples’ rates of HIV-positive Latino MSM identified through HIV testing and linked to HIV medical care and prevention services. Participants were recruited through seven apps. In Proyecto Protégete, 9,573 individuals completed the screener, 4,657 were eligible, and 359 (7.7% of those eligible) enrolled. Among those enrolled, 79% reported anal sex without a condom in the previous twelve months; 51% reported anal sex under the influence of alcohol. The HIV positivity rates were as follows: Proyecto Protégete, 1.71%; the agency, 1.25% (p = .293, compared to Proyecto Protégete); and the County, 1.09% (p = .172, compared to Proyecto Protégete). The rates of those confirmed as new HIV-positives and linked to medical care within 30 days were as follows: Proyecto Protégete, 71.4%; the agency, 81.5% (p = .450, compared to Proyecto Protégete); and the County, 77.3% (p = .503, compared to Proyecto Protégete). Proyecto Protégete had a higher rate of linked referrals to prevention services than the agency’s testing program (19.5% versus 8.3%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Frank H Galvan & Honghu Liu & Ronald A Brooks & Ying-Tung Chen & Ricardo Mendoza Lepe, 2022. "Using social and sexual networking mobile applications to promote HIV testing, medical care and prevention services among Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County, California, USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0268406
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268406
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268406&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0268406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Walker & Susan Griffin & Miqdad Asaria & Aki Tsuchiya & Mark Sculpher, 2019. "Striving for a Societal Perspective: A Framework for Economic Evaluations When Costs and Effects Fall on Multiple Sectors and Decision Makers," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 577-590, October.
    2. Juliane Andrea Duevel & Lena Hasemann & Luz María Peña-Longobardo & Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez & Isaac Aranda-Reneo & Juan Oliva-Moreno & Julio López-Bastida & Wolfgang Greiner, 2020. "Considering the societal perspective in economic evaluations: a systematic review in the case of depression," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Franklin & James Lomas & Gerry Richardson, 2020. "Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(7), pages 665-681, July.
    2. Claudia Fischer & Susanne Mayer & Nataša Perić & Judit Simon, 2022. "Harmonization issues in unit costing of service use for multi-country, multi-sectoral health economic evaluations: a scoping review," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Manuel Gomes & Elizabeth Murray & James Raftery, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 367-378, April.
    4. B. Rodríguez-Sánchez & S. Daugbjerg & L. M. Peña-Longobardo & J. Oliva-Moreno & I. Aranda-Reneo & A. Cicchetti & J. López-Bastida, 2023. "Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(2), pages 247-277, March.
    5. Francesco Ramponi & Simon Walker & Susan Griffin & Steve Parrott & Colin Drummond & Paolo Deluca & Simon Coulton & Mona Kanaan & Gerry Richardson, 2021. "Cost‐effectiveness analysis of public health interventions with impacts on health and criminal justice: An applied cross‐sectoral analysis of an alcohol misuse intervention," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 972-988, May.
    6. Sebastian Hinde & Simon Walker & Hugues Lortie-Forgues, 2019. "Applying the three core concepts of economic evaluation in health to education in the UK," Working Papers 170cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    7. Edward Cox & Simon Walker & Charlotte L. Edwardson & Stuart J. H. Biddle & Alexandra M. Clarke-Cornwell & Stacy A. Clemes & Melanie J. Davies & David W. Dunstan & Helen Eborall & Malcolm H. Granat & L, 2022. "The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Irina Pokhilenko & Luca M. M. Janssen & Mickael Hiligsmann & Silvia M. A. A. Evers & Ruben M. W. A. Drost & Aggie T. G. Paulus & Leonarda G. M. Bremmers, 2021. "The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best–Worst Scaling Experiment," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 99-108, January.
    9. Yumi Asukai & Andrew Briggs & Louis P. Garrison & Benjamin P. Geisler & Peter J. Neumann & Daniel A. Ollendorf, 2021. "Principles of Economic Evaluation in a Pandemic Setting: An Expert Panel Discussion on Value Assessment During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(11), pages 1201-1208, November.
    10. Tuba Saygın Avşar & Xiaozhe Yang & Paula Lorgelly, 2023. "How is the Societal Perspective Defined in Health Technology Assessment? Guidelines from Around the Globe," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 123-138, February.
    11. David Glynn & Vijay S. Gc & Karl Claxton & Chris Littlewood & Claire Rothery, 2024. "Rapid Assessment of the Need for Evidence: Applying the Principles of Value of Information to Research Prioritisation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(9), pages 919-928, September.
    12. Lauren C Ramsay & Marina Richardson & Rafael N Miranda & Marian Hassan & Sarah K Brode & Elizabeth Rea & Beate Sander, 2023. "Inclusion of non-medical interventions in model-based economic evaluations for tuberculosis: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Sebastian Hinde & Laura Bojke & Peter Coventry, 2021. "The Cost Effectiveness of Ecotherapy as a Healthcare Intervention, Separating the Wood from the Trees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.
    14. William V. Padula & Hui-Han Chen & Charles E. Phelps, 2021. "Is the Choice of Cost-Effectiveness Threshold in Cost-Utility Analysis Endogenous to the Resulting Value of Technology? A Systematic Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 155-162, March.
    15. Emma Frew & Nafsika Afentou & Hamideh Mohtashami Borzadaran & Paolo Candio & Irina Pokhilenko, 2022. "Using Economics to Impact Local Obesity Policy: Introducing the UK Centre for Economics of Obesity (CEO)," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 629-635, September.
    16. Candio, Paolo & Meads, David & Hill, Andrew J. & Bojke, Laura, 2021. "Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 651-657.
    17. James Lomas & Jessica Ochalek & Rita Faria, 2022. "Avoiding Opportunity Cost Neglect in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health Technology Assessment," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 13-18, January.
    18. María J. Mendoza-Jiménez & Job Exel & Werner Brouwer, 2024. "On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(7), pages 1239-1260, September.
    19. Sebastian Hinde & Helen Weatherly & Gabriella Walker & Lorna K. Fraser, 2021. "What Does Economic Evaluation Mean in the Context of Children at the End of Their Life?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, November.
    20. Ana Duarte & Simon Walker & Andrew Metry & Ruth Wong & Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths & Mark Sculpher, 2021. "Jointly Modelling Economics and Epidemiology to Support Public Policy Decisions for the COVID-19 Response: A Review of UK Studies," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(8), pages 879-887, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0268406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.