IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0267966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Warfarin sensitivity is associated with increased hospital mortality in critically Ill patients

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyuan Ma
  • Ping Wang
  • Milan Mahesh
  • Cyrus P Elmi
  • Saeid Atashpanjeh
  • Bahar Khalighi
  • Gang Cheng
  • Mahesh Krishnamurthy
  • Koroush Khalighi

Abstract

Background: Warfarin is a widely used anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index and large interpatient variability in the therapeutic dose. Warfarin sensitivity has been reported to be associated with increased incidence of international normalized ratio (INR) > 5. However, whether warfarin sensitivity is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in critically ill patients remains unknown. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the utility of different machine learning algorithms for the prediction of warfarin sensitivity and to determine the impact of warfarin sensitivity on outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods: Nine different machine learning algorithms for the prediction of warfarin sensitivity were tested in the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Consortium cohort and Easton cohort. Furthermore, a total of 7,647 critically ill patients was analyzed for warfarin sensitivity on in-hospital mortality by multivariable regression. Covariates that potentially confound the association were further adjusted using propensity score matching or inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: We found that logistic regression (AUC = 0.879, 95% CI: 0.834–0.924) was indistinguishable from support vector machine with a linear kernel, neural network, AdaBoost and light gradient boosting trees, and significantly outperformed all the other machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, we found that warfarin sensitivity predicted by the logistic regression model was significantly associated with worse in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.01–1.77). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the logistic regression model is the best model for the prediction of warfarin sensitivity clinically and that warfarin sensitivity is likely to be a risk factor for adverse outcomes in critically ill patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyuan Ma & Ping Wang & Milan Mahesh & Cyrus P Elmi & Saeid Atashpanjeh & Bahar Khalighi & Gang Cheng & Mahesh Krishnamurthy & Koroush Khalighi, 2022. "Warfarin sensitivity is associated with increased hospital mortality in critically Ill patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267966
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267966&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0267966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiyuan Ma & Ping Wang & Zehui Gao & Ruobing Wang & Koroush Khalighi, 2018. "Ensemble of machine learning algorithms using the stacked generalization approach to estimate the warfarin dose," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Waqas & Walker, Shalika & Zeiler, Wim, 2022. "Improved solar photovoltaic energy generation forecast using deep learning-based ensemble stacking approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Jordan J Bird & Chloe M Barnes & Cristiano Premebida & Anikó Ekárt & Diego R Faria, 2020. "Country-level pandemic risk and preparedness classification based on COVID-19 data: A machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.