IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictions from masked motion with and without obstacles

Author

Listed:
  • Ariel Goldstein
  • Ido Rivlin
  • Alon Goldstein
  • Yoni Pertzov
  • Ran R Hassin

Abstract

Predicting the future is essential for organisms like Homo sapiens, who live in a dynamic and ever-changing world. Previous research has established that conscious stimuli can lead to non-conscious predictions. Here we examine whether masked stimuli can also induce such predictions. We use masked movement–with and without obstacles–to examine predictions from masked stimuli. In six experiments a moving object was masked using continuous flash suppression (CFS). A few hundred milliseconds after the object had disappeared, a conscious probe appeared in a location that was either consistent with the masked stimulus or not. In Experiments 1–3 the movement was linear, and reaction times (RTs) indicated predictions that were based on direction and speed of movement. In Experiment 4, the masked moving object collided with an obstacle and then disappeared. Predictions in this case should reflect deflection, and indeed reaction times revealed predictions on the deflection route. In Experiments 5 and 6 we introduce an innovative way of using eye-tracking during continuous flash suppression (CFS) and report physiological evidence–in the forms of eye-movements–for masked stimuli induced predictions. We thus conclude that humans can use dynamic masked stimuli to generate active predictions about the future, and use these predictions to guide behavior. We also discuss the possible interpretations of these findings in light of the current scientific discussion regarding the relation between masked presentation, subliminal perception and awareness measurement methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariel Goldstein & Ido Rivlin & Alon Goldstein & Yoni Pertzov & Ran R Hassin, 2020. "Predictions from masked motion with and without obstacles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-35, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239839
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239839
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239839&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Randall Flanagan & Roland S. Johansson, 2003. "Action plans used in action observation," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6950), pages 769-771, August.
    2. Lisandro Kaunitz & Alessio Fracasso & Angelika Lingnau & David Melcher, 2013. "Non-Conscious Processing of Motion Coherence Can Boost Conscious Access," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-5, April.
    3. Stanislas Dehaene & Lionel Naccache & Gurvan Le Clec'H & Etienne Koechlin & Michael Mueller & Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz & Pierre-FranÇois van de Moortele & Denis Le Bihan, 1998. "Imaging unconscious semantic priming," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6702), pages 597-600, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo Garaizar & Miguel A Vadillo & Diego López-de-Ipiña, 2014. "Presentation Accuracy of the Web Revisited: Animation Methods in the HTML5 Era," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Francesca Foti & Deny Menghini & Laura Mandolesi & Francesca Federico & Stefano Vicari & Laura Petrosini, 2013. "Learning by Observation: Insights from Williams Syndrome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Jürgen Kornmeier & Kriti Bhatia & Ellen Joos, 2021. "Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Sheth, Jesal D., 2021. "Disclosure of information under competition: An experimental study," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 158-180.
    5. Jairo Perez-Osorio & Hermann J Müller & Eva Wiese & Agnieszka Wykowska, 2015. "Gaze Following Is Modulated by Expectations Regarding Others’ Action Goals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Anne Keitel & Wolfgang Prinz & Moritz M Daum, 2014. "Perception of Individual and Joint Action in Infants and Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    7. Claire Monroy & Marlene Meyer & Sarah Gerson & Sabine Hunnius, 2017. "Statistical learning in social action contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Richard Morey & Jeffrey Rouder & Paul Speckman, 2009. "A Truncated-Probit Item Response Model for Estimating Psychophysical Thresholds," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 603-618, December.
    9. Weina Zhu & Jan Drewes & David Melcher, 2016. "Time for Awareness: The Influence of Temporal Properties of the Mask on Continuous Flash Suppression Effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Ellen Joos & Anne Giersch & Kriti Bhatia & Sven P Heinrich & Ludger Tebartz van Elst & Jürgen Kornmeier, 2020. "Using the perceptual past to predict the perceptual future influences the perceived present – A novel ERP paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-35, September.
    11. Jesal Sheth, 2019. "Disclosure of information under competition: An experimental study," Discussion Papers 2019-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    12. Christian Seegelke & Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes & Thomas Schack, 2013. "Simulating My Own or Others Action Plans? – Motor Representations, Not Visual Representations Are Recalled in Motor Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    13. Ettore Ambrosini & Vasudevi Reddy & Annette de Looper & Marcello Costantini & Beatriz Lopez & C Sinigaglia, 2013. "Looking Ahead: Anticipatory Gaze and Motor Ability in Infancy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-9, July.
    14. Floris P de Lange & Simon van Gaal & Victor A F Lamme & Stanislas Dehaene, 2011. "How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    15. Dmitry Smirnov & Fanny Lachat & Tomi Peltola & Juha M Lahnakoski & Olli-Pekka Koistinen & Enrico Glerean & Aki Vehtari & Riitta Hari & Mikko Sams & Lauri Nummenmaa, 2017. "Brain-to-brain hyperclassification reveals action-specific motor mapping of observed actions in humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Maurits Adam & Birgit Elsner, 2020. "The impact of salient action effects on 6-, 7-, and 11-month-olds’ goal-predictive gaze shifts for a human grasping action," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Miya K Rand & Sebastian Rentsch, 2016. "Eye-Hand Coordination during Visuomotor Adaptation with Different Rotation Angles: Effects of Terminal Visual Feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.