IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0222241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transience effect in capture-recapture studies: The importance of its biological meaning

Author

Listed:
  • Meritxell Genovart
  • Roger Pradel

Abstract

Capture–recapture (CR) models are an essential tool for estimating demographic parameters in most animal and some plant populations. To avoid drawing incorrect conclusions in any statistical inference, a crucial prerequisite is to assess the goodness of fit of a general model to the data. In CR models, a frequent cause of lack of fit, is the so-called transience effect, which is due to a lower expectation of re-observation of individuals marked for the first time as compared to other individuals. The transience effect may result either from different biological causes or from the sampling procedure. A transience effect is usually treated by distinguishing at least two age-classes in the survival probability, but other approaches may be more suitable. Here we develop a conceptual and analytical framework for including a transience effect in capture-recapture models. We show the implementation of two additional parametrizations that incorporate a transience effect. With these parametrizations, we can directly estimate the “transience probability” defined as the probability that a newly caught individual disappear from the population beyond what is expected based on the behavior of the previously caught individuals in the same sample. Additionally, these parametrizations allow testing biological hypotheses concerning drivers affecting this probability. Results from our case study show differences between parametrizations, with the parametrization most currently used giving different estimates, especially when including covariates. We advocate for a unifying framework for treating a transience effect, that helps clarifying the ideas and terminology, and where the biological reasons should be the rule for choosing the appropriate analytical procedure. This framework will also open new and powerful ways for the detection and exploration of ecological processes such as the costs of the first reproduction or the deleterious effects of some types of marking.

Suggested Citation

  • Meritxell Genovart & Roger Pradel, 2019. "Transience effect in capture-recapture studies: The importance of its biological meaning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222241
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222241&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0222241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Pradel, 2005. "Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 442-447, June.
    2. Gimenez, Olivier & Rossi, Vivien & Choquet, Rémi & Dehais, Camille & Doris, Blaise & Varella, Hubert & Vila, Jean-Pierre & Pradel, Roger, 2007. "State-space modelling of data on marked individuals," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 431-438.
    3. J. Andrew Royle, 2008. "Modeling Individual Effects in the Cormack–Jolly–Seber Model: A State–Space Formulation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 364-370, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gimenez, Olivier & Lebreton, Jean-Dominique & Gaillard, Jean-Michel & Choquet, Rémi & Pradel, Roger, 2012. "Estimating demographic parameters using hidden process dynamic models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 307-316.
    2. Gimenez, Olivier & Mansilla, Lorena & Klaich, M. Javier & Coscarella, Mariano A. & Pedraza, Susana N. & Crespo, Enrique A., 2019. "Inferring animal social networks with imperfect detection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 69-74.
    3. Choquet, Rémi & Garnier, Alexandre & Awuve, Edem & Besnard, Aurélien, 2017. "Transient state estimation using continuous-time processes applied to opportunistic capture–recapture data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 157-163.
    4. Bird, Tomas & Lyon, Jarod & Wotherspoon, Simon & King, Ruth & McCarthy, Michael, 2017. "Accounting for false mortality in telemetry tag applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 116-125.
    5. Oliver, Lauren J. & Morgan, Byron J.T. & Durant, Sarah M. & Pettorelli, Nathalie, 2011. "Individual heterogeneity in recapture probability and survival estimates in cheetah," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 776-784.
    6. Sigourney, Douglas B. & Munch, Stephan B. & Letcher, Benjamin H., 2012. "Combining a Bayesian nonparametric method with a hierarchical framework to estimate individual and temporal variation in growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 125-134.
    7. Robert M. Dorazio, 2020. "Objective prior distributions for Jolly‐Seber models of zero‐augmented data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1285-1296, December.
    8. Jennifer Pohle & Roland Langrock & Floris M. Beest & Niels Martin Schmidt, 2017. "Selecting the Number of States in Hidden Markov Models: Pragmatic Solutions Illustrated Using Animal Movement," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 270-293, September.
    9. Cecilia Soldatini & Yuri Vladimir Albores-Barajas & Bruno Massa & Olivier Gimenez, 2014. "Climate Driven Life Histories: The Case of the Mediterranean Storm Petrel," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    10. Tenan, Simone & Rotger Vallespir, Andreu & Igual, José Manuel & Moya, Óscar & Royle, J. Andrew & Tavecchia, Giacomo, 2013. "Population abundance, size structure and sex-ratio in an insular lizard," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 267(C), pages 39-47.
    11. Riki Herliansyah & Ruth King & Stuart King, 2022. "Laplace Approximations for Capture–Recapture Models in the Presence of Individual Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 401-418, September.
    12. Klaich, M. Javier & Kinas, Paul G. & Pedraza, Susana N. & Coscarella, Mariano A. & Crespo, Enrique A., 2011. "Estimating dyad association probability under imperfect and heterogeneous detection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2642-2650.
    13. Chris Sherlock & Tatiana Xifara & Sandra Telfer & Mike Begon, 2013. "A coupled hidden Markov model for disease interactions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 609-627, August.
    14. Vila, Jean-Pierre, 2012. "Enhanced consistency of the Resampled Convolution Particle Filter," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 786-797.
    15. Shirley Pledger & Edward Baker & Kim Scribner, 2013. "Breeding Return Times and Abundance in Capture–Recapture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 991-1001, December.
    16. Diana J. Cole, 2019. "Parameter redundancy and identifiability in hidden Markov models," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(2), pages 105-118, August.
    17. Simon J. Bonner & Wei Zhang & Jiaqi Mu, 2024. "On the identifiability of the trinomial model for mark‐recapture‐recovery studies," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    18. Pedersen, M.W. & Berg, C.W. & Thygesen, U.H. & Nielsen, A. & Madsen, H., 2011. "Estimation methods for nonlinear state-space models in ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1394-1400.
    19. Louvrier, Julie & Chambert, Thierry & Marboutin, Eric & Gimenez, Olivier, 2018. "Accounting for misidentification and heterogeneity in occupancy studies using hidden Markov models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 61-69.
    20. Roland Langrock & Thomas Kneib & Alexander Sohn & Stacy L. DeRuiter, 2015. "Nonparametric inference in hidden Markov models using P-splines," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 520-528, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.