IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand and level of service inflation in Floating Catchment Area (FCA) methods

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Paez
  • Christopher D Higgins
  • Salvatore F Vivona

Abstract

Floating Catchment Area (FCA) methods are a popular tool to investigate accessibility to public facilities, in particular health care services. FCA approaches are attractive because, unlike other accessibility measures, they take into account the potential for congestion of facilities. This is done by 1) considering the population within the catchment area of a facility to calculate a variable that measures level of service, and then 2) aggregating the level of service by population centers subject to catchment area constraints. In this paper we discuss an effect of FCA approaches, an artifact that we term demand and level of service inflation. These artifacts are present in previous implementations of FCA methods. We argue that inflation makes interpretation of estimates of accessibility difficult, which has possible deleterious consequences for decision making. Next, we propose a simple and intuitive approach to proportionally allocate demandand and level of service in FCA calculations. The approach is based on a standardization of the impedance matrix, similar to approaches popular in the spatial statistics and econometrics literature. The result is a more intiuitive measure of accessibility that 1) provides a local version of the provider-to-population ratio; and 2) preserves the level of demand and the level of supply in a system. We illustrate the relevant issues with some examples, and then empirically by means of a case study of accessibility to family physicians in the Hamilton Census Metropolitan Area (CMA), in Ontario, Canada. Results indicate that demand and supply inflation/deflation affect the interpretation of accessibility analysis using existing FCA methods, and that the proposed adjustment can lead to more intuitive results.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Paez & Christopher D Higgins & Salvatore F Vivona, 2019. "Demand and level of service inflation in Floating Catchment Area (FCA) methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-38, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218773
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218773
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218773&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peige Song & Yajie Zhu & Xi Mao & Qi Li & Lin An, 2013. "Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Maternity Units in Shenzhen, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-7, July.
    2. Jan Bauer & Peter Müller & Werner Maier & David A Groneberg, 2017. "Orthopedic workforce planning in Germany – an analysis of orthopedic accessibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Jan Bauer & David A Groneberg, 2016. "Measuring Spatial Accessibility of Health Care Providers – Introduction of a Variable Distance Decay Function within the Floating Catchment Area (FCA) Method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Misuzu Fujita & Yasunori Sato & Kengo Nagashima & Sho Takahashi & Akira Hata, 2017. "Impact of geographic accessibility on utilization of the annual health check-ups by income level in Japan: A multilevel analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wende, Danny & Kopetsch, Thomas & Richter, Wolfram F., 2020. "Planning health care capacities with a gravity equation," Ruhr Economic Papers 888, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    2. Tao, Zhuolin & Cheng, Yang & Du, Shishuai & Feng, Ling & Wang, Shaoshuai, 2020. "Accessibility to delivery care in Hubei Province, China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Jing Luo & Guangping Chen & Chang Li & Bingyan Xia & Xuan Sun & Siyun Chen, 2018. "Use of an E2SFCA Method to Measure and Analyse Spatial Accessibility to Medical Services for Elderly People in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Anna-Theresa Renner & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2020. "Modeling inter-regional patient mobility: Does distance go far enough?," Economics working papers 2020-04, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    5. Demitiry, Maria & Higgins, Christopher D. & Páez, Antonio & Miller, Eric J., 2022. "Accessibility to primary care physicians: Comparing floating catchments with a utility-based approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Michael Irlacher & Dieter Pennerstorfer & Anna‐Theresa Renner & Florian Unger, 2023. "Modeling Interregional Patient Mobility: Theory And Evidence From Spatially Explicit Data," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1493-1532, November.
    7. Meng Tian & Lei Yuan & Renzhong Guo & Yongsheng Wu & Xiaojian Liu, 2022. "Evaluations of Spatial Accessibility and Equity of Multi-Tiered Medical System: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Sarah Nurain Mohd Noh & Suhana Jawahir & Yeung R’ong Tan & Iqbal Ab Rahim & Ee Hong Tan, 2022. "The Health-Seeking Behavior among Malaysian Adults in Urban and Rural Areas Who Reported Sickness: Findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Gu, Zongni & Luo, Xiaolong & Tang, Mi & Liu, Xiaoman, 2023. "Does the edge effect impact the healthcare equity? An examination of the equity in hospitals accessibility in the edge city in multi-scale," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Juel Paul & Earl Edwards, 2019. "Temporal availability of public health care in developing countries of the Caribbean: An improved two‐step floating catchment area method for estimating spatial accessibility to health care," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 536-556, January.
    11. Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian & Azmawati Mohammed Nawi & Rozita Hod & Huan-Keat Chan & Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan, 2021. "Area-Level Determinants in Colorectal Cancer Spatial Clustering Studies: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Xuechen Xiong & Chao Jin & Haile Chen & Li Luo, 2016. "Using the Fusion Proximal Area Method and Gravity Method to Identify Areas with Physician Shortages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Pereira, Rafael H.M. & Braga, Carlos Kauê Vieira & Servo, Luciana Mendes & Serra, Bernardo & Amaral, Pedro & Gouveia, Nelson & Paez, Antonio, 2021. "Geographic access to COVID-19 healthcare in Brazil using a balanced float catchment area approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Lei Zhu & Shuang Zhong & Wei Tu & Jing Zheng & Shenjing He & Junzhe Bao & Cunrui Huang, 2019. "Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Medical Resources at the Community Level in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Dwight Lewis & Nickolas Freeman & Irem Sengul Orgut & Thera Tyner & Ryan Tramp & Niranjan Biligowda & Matthew Hudnall & Xin Thomas Yang & Thomas English & Marilyn Whitman & Steven Samsel & James Cochr, 2023. "Analytic Framework to Improve Access for a State Medicaid Agency," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 390-407, November.
    16. Chen, Bi Yu & Cheng, Xue-Ping & Kwan, Mei-Po & Schwanen, Tim, 2020. "Evaluating spatial accessibility to healthcare services under travel time uncertainty: A reliability-based floating catchment area approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Kapatsila, Bogdan & Palacios, Manuel Santana & Grisé, Emily & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2023. "Resolving the accessibility dilemma: Comparing cumulative and gravity-based measures of accessibility in eight Canadian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Esposito, Tonino & Chabot, Martin & Caldwell, Johanna & Webb, Calum & Delaye, Ashleigh & Fluke, John D. & Trocmé, Nico & Bywaters, Paul, 2022. "The differential association of socioeconomic vulnerabilities and neglect-related child protection involvement across geographies: Multilevel structural equation modeling," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.