IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0206354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource-Area-Dependence Analysis: Inferring animal resource needs from home-range and mapping data

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E Kenward
  • Eduardo M Arraut
  • Peter A Robertson
  • Sean S Walls
  • Nicholas M Casey
  • Nicholas J Aebischer

Abstract

An animal’s home-range can be expected to encompass the resources it requires for surviving or reproducing. Thus, animals inhabiting a heterogeneous landscape, where resource patches vary in size, shape and distribution, will naturally have home-ranges of varied sizes, so that each home-range encompasses a minimum required amount of a resource. Home-range size can be estimated from telemetry data, and often key resources, or proxies for them such as the areas of important habitat types, can be mapped. We propose a new method, Resource-Area-Dependence Analysis (RADA), which uses a sample of tracked animals and a categorical map to i) infer in which map categories important resources are accessible, ii) within which home range cores they are found, and iii) estimate the mean minimum areas of these map categories required for such resource provision. We provide three examples of applying RADA to datasets of radio-tracked animals from southern England: 15 red squirrels Sciurus vulgaris, 17 gray squirrels S. carolinensis and 114 common buzzards Buteo buteo. The analyses showed that each red squirrel required a mean (95% CL) of 0.48 ha (0.24–-0.97) of pine wood within the outermost home-range, each gray squirrel needed 0.34 ha (0.11–1.12) ha of mature deciduous woodland and 0.035–0.046 ha of wheat, also within the outermost home-range, while each buzzard required 0.54 ha (0.35–0.82) of rough ground close to the home-range center and 14 ha (11–17) of meadow within an intermediate core, with 52% of them also relying on 0.41 ha (0.29–0.59) of suburban land near the home-range center. RADA thus provides a useful tool to infer key animal resource requirements during studies of animal movement and habitat use.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E Kenward & Eduardo M Arraut & Peter A Robertson & Sean S Walls & Nicholas M Casey & Nicholas J Aebischer, 2018. "Resource-Area-Dependence Analysis: Inferring animal resource needs from home-range and mapping data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206354
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206354&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0206354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell, Michael S. & Powell, Roger A., 2008. "Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 409-414.
    2. Benhamou, Simon & Riotte-Lambert, Louise, 2012. "Beyond the Utilization Distribution: Identifying home range areas that are intensively exploited or repeatedly visited," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 112-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge A Vázquez Diosdado & Zoe E Barker & Holly R Hodges & Jonathan R Amory & Darren P Croft & Nick J Bell & Edward A Codling, 2018. "Space-use patterns highlight behavioural differences linked to lameness, parity, and days in milk in barn-housed dairy cows," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Sells, Sarah N. & Mitchell, Michael S., 2020. "The economics of territory selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    3. Bourhis, Yoann & Poggi, Sylvain & Mammeri, Youcef & Cortesero, Anne-Marie & Le Ralec, Anne & Parisey, Nicolas, 2015. "Perception-based foraging for competing resources: Assessing pest population dynamics at the landscape scale from heterogeneous resource distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 211-221.
    4. Downs, Joni A. & Heller, Justin H. & Loraamm, Rebecca & Stein, Dana Oppenheim & McDaniel, Cassandra & Onorato, Dave, 2012. "Accuracy of home range estimators for homogeneous and inhomogeneous point patterns," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 66-73.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.