IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0171750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biological responses to disturbance from simulated deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel O B Jones
  • Stefanie Kaiser
  • Andrew K Sweetman
  • Craig R Smith
  • Lenaick Menot
  • Annemiek Vink
  • Dwight Trueblood
  • Jens Greinert
  • David S M Billett
  • Pedro Martinez Arbizu
  • Teresa Radziejewska
  • Ravail Singh
  • Baban Ingole
  • Tanja Stratmann
  • Erik Simon-Lledó
  • Jennifer M Durden
  • Malcolm R Clark

Abstract

Commercial-scale mining for polymetallic nodules could have a major impact on the deep-sea environment, but the effects of these mining activities on deep-sea ecosystems are very poorly known. The first commercial test mining for polymetallic nodules was carried out in 1970. Since then a number of small-scale commercial test mining or scientific disturbance studies have been carried out. Here we evaluate changes in faunal densities and diversity of benthic communities measured in response to these 11 simulated or test nodule mining disturbances using meta-analysis techniques. We find that impacts are often severe immediately after mining, with major negative changes in density and diversity of most groups occurring. However, in some cases, the mobile fauna and small-sized fauna experienced less negative impacts over the longer term. At seven sites in the Pacific, multiple surveys assessed recovery in fauna over periods of up to 26 years. Almost all studies show some recovery in faunal density and diversity for meiofauna and mobile megafauna, often within one year. However, very few faunal groups return to baseline or control conditions after two decades. The effects of polymetallic nodule mining are likely to be long term. Our analyses show considerable negative biological effects of seafloor nodule mining, even at the small scale of test mining experiments, although there is variation in sensitivity amongst organisms of different sizes and functional groups, which have important implications for ecosystem responses. Unfortunately, many past studies have limitations that reduce their effectiveness in determining responses. We provide recommendations to improve future mining impact test studies. Further research to assess the effects of test-mining activities will inform ways to improve mining practices and guide effective environmental management of mining activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel O B Jones & Stefanie Kaiser & Andrew K Sweetman & Craig R Smith & Lenaick Menot & Annemiek Vink & Dwight Trueblood & Jens Greinert & David S M Billett & Pedro Martinez Arbizu & Teresa Radziejew, 2017. "Biological responses to disturbance from simulated deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0171750
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171750&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0171750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Collins, Patrick Colman & Croot, Peter & Carlsson, Jens & Colaço, Ana & Grehan, Anthony & Hyeong, Kiseong & Kennedy, Robert & Mohn, Christian & Smith, Samantha & Yamamoto, Hiroyuki & Rowden, Ashley, 2013. "A primer for the Environmental Impact Assessment of mining at seafloor massive sulfide deposits," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 198-209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arie Christoffel Seijmonsbergen & Sanne Valentijn & Lisan Westerhof & Kenneth Frank Rijsdijk, 2022. "Exploring Ocean Floor Geodiversity in Relation to Mineral Resources in the Southwest Pacific Ocean," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Husson, Bérengère & Sarrazin, Jozée & van Oevelen, Dick & Sarradin, Pierre-Marie & Soetaert, Karline & Menesguen, Alain, 2018. "Modelling the interactions of the hydrothermal mussel Bathymodiolus azoricus with vent fluid," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 377(C), pages 35-50.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0171750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.