IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0169649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study

Author

Listed:
  • Aiden Doherty
  • Dan Jackson
  • Nils Hammerla
  • Thomas Plötz
  • Patrick Olivier
  • Malcolm H Granat
  • Tom White
  • Vincent T van Hees
  • Michael I Trenell
  • Christoper G Owen
  • Stephen J Preece
  • Rob Gillions
  • Simon Sheard
  • Tim Peakman
  • Soren Brage
  • Nicholas J Wareham

Abstract

Background: Physical activity has not been objectively measured in prospective cohorts with sufficiently large numbers to reliably detect associations with multiple health outcomes. Technological advances now make this possible. We describe the methods used to collect and analyse accelerometer measured physical activity in over 100,000 participants of the UK Biobank study, and report variation by age, sex, day, time of day, and season. Methods: Participants were approached by email to wear a wrist-worn accelerometer for seven days that was posted to them. Physical activity information was extracted from 100Hz raw triaxial acceleration data after calibration, removal of gravity and sensor noise, and identification of wear / non-wear episodes. We report age- and sex-specific wear-time compliance and accelerometer measured physical activity, overall and by hour-of-day, week-weekend day and season. Results: 103,712 datasets were received (44.8% response), with a median wear-time of 6.9 days (IQR:6.5–7.0). 96,600 participants (93.3%) provided valid data for physical activity analyses. Vector magnitude, a proxy for overall physical activity, was 7.5% (2.35mg) lower per decade of age (Cohen’s d = 0.9). Women had a higher vector magnitude than men, apart from those aged 45-54yrs. There were major differences in vector magnitude by time of day (d = 0.66). Vector magnitude differences between week and weekend days (d = 0.12 for men, d = 0.09 for women) and between seasons (d = 0.27 for men, d = 0.15 for women) were small. Conclusions: It is feasible to collect and analyse objective physical activity data in large studies. The summary measure of overall physical activity is lower in older participants and age-related differences in activity are most prominent in the afternoon and evening. This work lays the foundation for studies of physical activity and its health consequences. Our summary variables are part of the UK Biobank dataset and can be used by researchers as exposures, confounding factors or outcome variables in future analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiden Doherty & Dan Jackson & Nils Hammerla & Thomas Plötz & Patrick Olivier & Malcolm H Granat & Tom White & Vincent T van Hees & Michael I Trenell & Christoper G Owen & Stephen J Preece & Rob Gillio, 2017. "Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169649
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169649
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169649&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0169649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongliang Feng & Lulu Yang & Yannis Yan Liang & Sizhi Ai & Yaping Liu & Yue Liu & Xinyi Jin & Binbin Lei & Jing Wang & Nana Zheng & Xinru Chen & Joey W. Y. Chan & Raymond Kim Wai Sum & Ngan Yin Chan &, 2023. "Associations of timing of physical activity with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Marta Karas & Jiawei Bai & Marcin Strączkiewicz & Jaroslaw Harezlak & Nancy W. Glynn & Tamara Harris & Vadim Zipunnikov & Ciprian Crainiceanu & Jacek K. Urbanek, 2019. "Accelerometry Data in Health Research: Challenges and Opportunities," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 210-237, July.
    3. Grégory Hammad & Mathilde Reyt & Nikita Beliy & Marion Baillet & Michele Deantoni & Alexia Lesoinne & Vincenzo Muto & Christina Schmidt, 2021. "pyActigraphy: Open-source python package for actigraphy data visualization and analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Clark, Stephen & Birkin, Mark & Lomax, Nik & Morris, Michelle, 2020. "Developing a whole systems obesity classification for the UK Biobank Cohort," OSF Preprints 7nqgd, Center for Open Science.
    5. Thomas G. Brooks & Nicholas F. Lahens & Gregory R. Grant & Yvette I. Sheline & Garret A. FitzGerald & Carsten Skarke, 2023. "Diurnal rhythms of wrist temperature are associated with future disease risk in the UK Biobank," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Luiza Isnardi Cardoso Ricardo & Andrea Wendt & Leony Morgana Galliano & Werner de Andrade Muller & Gloria Izabel Niño Cruz & Fernando Wehrmeister & Soren Brage & Ulf Ekelund & Inácio Crochemore M. Sil, 2020. "Number of days required to estimate physical activity constructs objectively measured in different age groups: Findings from three Brazilian (Pelotas) population-based birth cohorts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Xinyue Li & Hongyu Zhao, 2020. "Automated feature extraction from population wearable device data identified novel loci associated with sleep and circadian rhythms," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Bernadette Nakabazzi & Lucy-Joy M Wachira & Adewale L Oyeyemi & Ronald Ssenyonga & Vincent O Onywera, 2020. "Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of accelerometer measured physical activity levels of school-going children in Kampala city, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Pietro Luigi Invernizzi & Gabriele Signorini & Raffaele Scurati & Giovanni Michielon & Stefano Benedini & Andrea Bosio & Walter Staiano, 2022. "The UP150: A Multifactorial Environmental Intervention to Promote Employee Physical and Mental Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Pontin, Francesca & Lomax, Nik & Clarke, Graham & Morris, Michelle A., 2021. "Socio-demographic determinants of physical activity and app usage from smartphone data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    11. Jin Luo & Raymond Y. W. Lee, 2022. "Opposing patterns in self-reported and measured physical activity levels in middle-aged adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 567-573, September.
    12. Scott Duncan & Tom Stewart & Lisa Mackay & Jono Neville & Anantha Narayanan & Caroline Walker & Sarah Berry & Susan Morton, 2018. "Wear-Time Compliance with a Dual-Accelerometer System for Capturing 24-h Behavioural Profiles in Children and Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Leonie Heron & Mark A. Tully & Frank Kee & Ciaran O’Neill, 2023. "Inpatient care utilisation and expenditure associated with objective physical activity: econometric analysis of the UK Biobank," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(4), pages 489-497, June.
    14. Esmonde, Katelyn & Roth, Stephen & Walker, Alexis, 2023. "A social and ethical framework for providing health information obtained from combining genetics and fitness tracking data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.