IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0119683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cost-Effectiveness of Biologics for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jaana T Joensuu
  • Saara Huoponen
  • Kalle J Aaltonen
  • Yrjö T Konttinen
  • Dan Nordström
  • Marja Blom

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Economic evaluations provide information to aid the optimal utilization of limited healthcare resources. Costs of biologics for Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are remarkably high, which makes these agents an important target for economic evaluations. This systematic review aims to identify existing studies examining the cost-effectiveness of biologics for RA, assess their quality and report their results systematically. Methods: A literature search covering Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, ACP Journal club and Web of Science was performed in March 2013. The cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of one or more available biological drugs for the treatment of RA in adults were included. Two independent investigators systematically collected information and assessed the quality of the studies. To enable the comparison of the results, all costs were converted to 2013 euro. Results: Of the 4890 references found in the literature search, 41 CUAs were included in the current systematic review. While considering only direct costs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) ranged from 39,000 to 1 273,000 €/quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained in comparison to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) in cDMARD naïve patients. Among patients with an insufficient response to cDMARDs, biologics were associated with ICERs ranging from 12,000 to 708,000 €/QALY. Rituximab was found to be the most cost-effective alternative compared to other biologics among the patients with an insufficient response to TNFi. Conclusions: When 35,000 €/QALY is considered as a threshold for the ICER, TNFis do not seem to be cost-effective among cDMARD naïve patients and patients with an insufficient response to cDMARDs. With thresholds of 50,000 to 100,000 €/QALY biologics might be cost-effective among patients with an inadequate response to cDMARDs. Standardization of multiattribute utility instruments and a validated standard conversion method for missing utility measures would enable better comparison between CUAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaana T Joensuu & Saara Huoponen & Kalle J Aaltonen & Yrjö T Konttinen & Dan Nordström & Marja Blom, 2015. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Biologics for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119683
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119683&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0119683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Merkesdal & Timm Kirchhoff & Diane Wolka & Gunter Ladinek & Adrian Kielhorn & Andrea Rubbert-Roth, 2010. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab treatment in patients in Germany with rheumatoid arthritis after etanercept-failure," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(1), pages 95-104, February.
    2. Christine Nguyen & Mark Bounthavong & Margaret Mendes & Melissa Christopher & Josephine Tran & Rashid Kazerooni & Anthony Morreale, 2012. "Cost Utility of Tumour Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 575-593, July.
    3. B. Jönsson & G. Kobelt & J. Smolen, 2008. "The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: uptake of new therapies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 8(2), pages 61-86, January.
    4. J. Lundkvist & F. Kastäng & G. Kobelt, 2008. "The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: health burden and costs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 8(2), pages 49-60, January.
    5. Drummond, Michael F. & Sculpher, Mark J. & Torrance, George W. & O'Brien, Bernie J. & Stoddart, Greg L., 2005. "Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780198529453.
    6. Ingrid Lekander & Fredrik Borgström & Jörgen Lysholm & Ronald Vollenhoven & Staffan Lindblad & Pierre Geborek & Gisela Kobelt, 2013. "The cost-effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Swedish clinical practice," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(6), pages 863-873, December.
    7. Kalle J Aaltonen & Liisa M Virkki & Antti Malmivaara & Yrjö T Konttinen & Dan C Nordström & Marja Blom, 2012. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Existing TNF Blocking Agents in Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Bin Wu & Alisa Wilson & Fang-fang Wang & Su-li Wang & Daniel J Wallace & Michael H Weisman & Liang-jing Lu, 2012. "Cost Effectiveness of Different Treatment Strategies in the Treatment of Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saara Huoponen & Kalle J Aaltonen & Jaana Viikinkoski & Jarno Rutanen & Heikki Relas & Kirsi Taimen & Kari Puolakka & Dan Nordström & Marja Blom, 2019. "Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krol, Marieke & Brouwer, Werner, 2015. "Unpaid work in health economic evaluations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 127-137.
    2. Stefan Scholz & Thomas Mittendorf, 2014. "Modeling rheumatoid arthritis using different techniques - a review of model construction and results," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Evo Alemao & Maiwenn J Al & Annelies A Boonen & Matthew D Stevenson & Suzanne M M Verstappen & Kaleb Michaud & Michael E Weinblatt & Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken, 2018. "Conceptual model for the health technology assessment of current and novel interventions in rheumatoid arthritis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Paul Gavaza & Karen Rascati & Abiola Oladapo & Star Khoza, 2012. "The State of Health Economic Research in South Africa," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(10), pages 925-940, October.
    5. Bogdan Batko & Paulina Rolska-Wójcik & Magdalena Władysiuk, 2019. "Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis Depending on Type of Treatment—A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Azucena Pedraz-Marcos & Ana María Palmar-Santos & Claire Anne Hale & Juan Zarco-Colón & Milagros Ramasco-Gutiérrez & Eva García-Perea & Teresa Velasco-Ripoll & Josefina Martín-Alarcón & Nuria Sa, 2020. "Living With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Spain: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experience and the Role of Health Professionals," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(8), pages 551-560, November.
    7. Karine Chevreul & Georges Haour & Sandy Lucier & Stephanie Harvard & Marie-Laure Laroche & Xavier Mariette & Alain Saraux & Isabelle Durand-Zaleski & Francis Guillemin & Bruno Fautrel, 2014. "Evolution of Direct Costs in the First Years of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Impact of Early versus Late Biologic Initiation - An Economic Analysis Based on the ESPOIR Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.
    8. Michael Drummond & Bengt Jönsson & Frans Rutten & Tom Stargardt, 2011. "Reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing versus health technology assessment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 263-271, June.
    9. Kurt Brekke & Dag Dalen & Tor Holmås, 2014. "Diffusion of pharmaceuticals: cross-country evidence of anti-TNF drugs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(9), pages 937-951, December.
    10. Márta Péntek & Gyula Poór & Piotr Wiland & Martina Olejárová & Marek Brzosko & Catalin Codreanu & Nóra Brodszky & László Gulácsi, 2014. "Biological therapy in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: issues in Central and Eastern European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 35-43, May.
    11. P. Laires & F. Exposto & R. Mesquita & A. Martins & L. Cunha-Miranda & J. Fonseca, 2013. "Patients’ access to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between Portugal and other European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(6), pages 875-885, December.
    12. Ulf Persson, 2012. "Value Based Pricing in Sweden: Lessons for Design?," Seminar Briefing 000141, Office of Health Economics.
    13. Benjamin Birkner & Jürgen Rech & Tom Stargardt, 2020. "Cost-utility analysis of de-escalating biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Márta Péntek & László Gulácsi & Bernadette Rojkovich & Valentin Brodszky & Job Exel & Werner Brouwer, 2014. "Subjective health expectations at biological therapy initiation: a survey of rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 83-92, May.
    15. László Gulácsi, 2010. "Future challenges for health economics and health technology assessment of biological drugs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(3), pages 235-238, June.
    16. Sonja Merkesdal & Timm Kirchhoff & Diane Wolka & Gunter Ladinek & Adrian Kielhorn & Andrea Rubbert-Roth, 2010. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab treatment in patients in Germany with rheumatoid arthritis after etanercept-failure," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(1), pages 95-104, February.
    17. Paal Joranger & Arild Nesbakken & Halfdan Sorbye & Geir Hoff & Arne Oshaug & Eline Aas, 2020. "Survival and costs of colorectal cancer treatment and effects of changing treatment strategies: a model approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(3), pages 321-334, April.
    18. Saha, Sanjib & Gerdtham, Ulf-G. & Toresson, Håkan & Minthon, Lennart & Jarl, Johan, 2018. "Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Screening of Dementia," Working Papers 2018:20, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    19. Mark Oppe & Daniela Ortín-Sulbarán & Carlos Vila Silván & Anabel Estévez-Carrillo & Juan M. Ramos-Goñi, 2021. "Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(5), pages 711-721, July.
    20. Laurence M. Djatche & Stefan Varga & Robert D. Lieberthal, 2018. "Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin Adherence for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 371-380, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.