IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0117423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure’ (MACE) Scale for the Retrospective Assessment of Abuse and Neglect During Development

Author

Listed:
  • Martin H Teicher
  • Angelika Parigger

Abstract

There is increasing interest in childhood maltreatment as a potent stimulus that may alter trajectories of brain development, induce epigenetic modifications and enhance risk for medical and psychiatric disorders. Although a number of useful scales exist for retrospective assessment of abuse and neglect they have significant limitations. Moreover, they fail to provide detailed information on timing of exposure, which is critical for delineation of sensitive periods. The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale was developed in a sample of 1051 participants using item response theory to gauge severity of exposure to ten types of maltreatment (emotional neglect, non-verbal emotional abuse, parental physical maltreatment, parental verbal abuse, peer emotional abuse, peer physical bullying, physical neglect, sexual abuse, witnessing interparental violence and witnessing violence to siblings) during each year of childhood. Items included in the subscales had acceptable psychometric properties based on infit and outfit mean square statistics, and each subscale passed Andersen’s Likelihood ratio test. The MACE provides an overall severity score and multiplicity score (number of types of maltreatment experienced) with excellent test-retest reliability. Each type of maltreatment showed good reliability as did severity of exposure across each year of childhood. MACE Severity correlated 0.738 with Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) score and MACE Multiplicity correlated 0.698 with the Adverse Childhood Experiences scale (ACE). However, MACE accounted for 2.00- and 2.07-fold more of the variance, on average, in psychiatric symptom ratings than CTQ or ACE, respectively, based on variance decomposition. Different types of maltreatment had distinct and often unique developmental patterns. The 52-item MACE, a simpler Maltreatment Abuse and Exposure Scale (MAES) that only assesses overall exposure and the original test instrument (MACE-X) with several additional items plus spreadsheets and R code for scoring are provided to facilitate use and to spur further development.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin H Teicher & Angelika Parigger, 2015. "The ‘Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure’ (MACE) Scale for the Retrospective Assessment of Abuse and Neglect During Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-37, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117423
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117423&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0117423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akemi Tomoda & Ann Polcari & Carl M Anderson & Martin H Teicher, 2012. "Reduced Visual Cortex Gray Matter Volume and Thickness in Young Adults Who Witnessed Domestic Violence during Childhood," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Warren Torgerson, 1965. "Multidimensional scaling of similarity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 30(4), pages 379-393, December.
    3. Warren Torgerson, 1952. "Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(4), pages 401-419, December.
    4. H. Brogden, 1977. "The rasch model, the law of comparative judgment and additive conjoint measurement," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(4), pages 631-634, December.
    5. Erling Andersen, 1973. "A goodness of fit test for the rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 123-140, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vera Maria Wente & Petra Retz-Junginger & Anselm Crombach & Wolfgang Retz & Steffen Barra, 2023. "The Suitability of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in Criminal Offender Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Pam Phojanakong & Emily Brown Weida & Gabriella Grimaldi & Félice Lê-Scherban & Mariana Chilton, 2019. "Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination Are Associated with Food Insecurity and Poor Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ick Hoon Jin & Minjeong Jeon & Michael Schweinberger & Jonghyun Yun & Lizhen Lin, 2022. "Multilevel network item response modelling for discovering differences between innovation and regular school systems in Korea," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1225-1244, November.
    2. Roger Shepard, 1974. "Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 373-421, December.
    3. Alexander Strehl & Joydeep Ghosh, 2003. "Relationship-Based Clustering and Visualization for High-Dimensional Data Mining," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 208-230, May.
    4. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    5. Lionel WILNER, 2019. "The Dynamics of Individual Happiness," Working Papers 2019-18, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    6. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    7. Oscar Claveria & Enric Monte & Salvador Torra, 2017. "A new approach for the quantification of qualitative measures of economic expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2685-2706, November.
    8. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Jinkai Yu & Wenjing Bi, 2019. "Evolution of Marine Environmental Governance Policy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Daniela Raccanello & Giada Vicentini & Elena Trifiletti & Roberto Burro, 2020. "A Rasch Analysis of the School-Related Well-Being (SRW) Scale: Measuring Well-Being in the Transition from Primary to Secondary School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. David J. Hessen, 2023. "Fitting and Testing Log-Linear Subpopulation Models with Known Support," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 917-939, September.
    12. Walesiak Marek & Dudek Andrzej, 2017. "Selecting the Optimal Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for Metric Data With R Environment," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(3), pages 521-540, September.
    13. Mirta Galesic & A. Walkyria Goode & Thomas S. Wallsten & Kent L. Norman, 2018. "Using Tversky’s contrast model to investigate how features of similarity affect judgments of likelihood," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(2), pages 163-169, March.
    14. C. Glas & Anna Dagohoy, 2007. "A Person Fit Test For Irt Models For Polytomous Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 159-180, June.
    15. Lewis, R.M. & Trosset, M.W., 2006. "Sensitivity analysis of the strain criterion for multidimensional scaling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 135-153, January.
    16. Morales José F. & Song Tingting & Auerbach Arleen D. & Wittkowski Knut M., 2008. "Phenotyping Genetic Diseases Using an Extension of µ-Scores for Multivariate Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Haruhiko Ogasawara, 2013. "Asymptotic properties of the Bayes modal estimators of item parameters in item response theory," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2559-2583, December.
    18. Benjamin B. Risk & David S. Matteson & David Ruppert & Ani Eloyan & Brian S. Caffo, 2014. "An evaluation of independent component analyses with an application to resting-state fMRI," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 224-236, March.
    19. Carter T. Butts & Kathleen M. Carley, 2005. "Some Simple Algorithms for Structural Comparison," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 291-305, December.
    20. Raatikainen, Mika & Skön, Jukka-Pekka & Leiviskä, Kauko & Kolehmainen, Mikko, 2016. "Intelligent analysis of energy consumption in school buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 416-429.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.