IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0078665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic Information Can Retrieve Known Biological Associations: Implications for Biomedical Knowledge Discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Herman H H B M van Haagen
  • Peter A C 't Hoen
  • Barend Mons
  • Erik A Schultes

Abstract

Motivation: Weighted semantic networks built from text-mined literature can be used to retrieve known protein-protein or gene-disease associations, and have been shown to anticipate associations years before they are explicitly stated in the literature. Our text-mining system recognizes over 640,000 biomedical concepts: some are specific (i.e., names of genes or proteins) others generic (e.g., ‘Homo sapiens’). Generic concepts may play important roles in automated information retrieval, extraction, and inference but may also result in concept overload and confound retrieval and reasoning with low-relevance or even spurious links. Here, we attempted to optimize the retrieval performance for protein-protein interactions (PPI) by filtering generic concepts (node filtering) or links to generic concepts (edge filtering) from a weighted semantic network. First, we defined metrics based on network properties that quantify the specificity of concepts. Then using these metrics, we systematically filtered generic information from the network while monitoring retrieval performance of known protein-protein interactions. We also systematically filtered specific information from the network (inverse filtering), and assessed the retrieval performance of networks composed of generic information alone. Results: Filtering generic or specific information induced a two-phase response in retrieval performance: initially the effects of filtering were minimal but beyond a critical threshold network performance suddenly drops. Contrary to expectations, networks composed exclusively of generic information demonstrated retrieval performance comparable to unfiltered networks that also contain specific concepts. Furthermore, an analysis using individual generic concepts demonstrated that they can effectively support the retrieval of known protein-protein interactions. For instance the concept “binding” is indicative for PPI retrieval and the concept “mutation abnormality” is indicative for gene-disease associations. Conclusion: Generic concepts are important for information retrieval and cannot be removed from semantic networks without negative impact on retrieval performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Herman H H B M van Haagen & Peter A C 't Hoen & Barend Mons & Erik A Schultes, 2013. "Generic Information Can Retrieve Known Biological Associations: Implications for Biomedical Knowledge Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078665
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078665&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0078665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil R. Smalheiser, 2012. "Literature‐based discovery: Beyond the ABCs," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 218-224, February.
    2. Neil R. Smalheiser, 2012. "Literature-based discovery: Beyond the ABCs," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 218-224, February.
    3. Herman H H B M van Haagen & Peter A C 't Hoen & Alessandro Botelho Bovo & Antoine de Morrée & Erik M van Mulligen & Christine Chichester & Jan A Kors & Johan T den Dunnen & Gert-Jan B van Ommen & Silv, 2009. "Novel Protein-Protein Interactions Inferred from Literature Context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-8, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrej Kastrin & Dimitar Hristovski, 2021. "Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1415-1451, February.
    2. Yuya Kajikawa, 2022. "Reframing evidence in evidence-based policy making and role of bibliometrics: toward transdisciplinary scientometric research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5571-5585, September.
    3. Agniv Adhikari & Paramita Das & Abhik Mukherjee, 2019. "Generating a representative keyword subset pertaining to an academic conference series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 749-770, May.
    4. Kostoff, Ronald N. & Patel, Uptal, 2015. "Literature-related discovery and innovation: Chronic kidney disease," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 341-351.
    5. Nakamura, Hiroko & Suzuki, Shinji & Sakata, Ichiro & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2015. "Knowledge combination modeling: The measurement of knowledge similarity between different technological domains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 187-201.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.