IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0047410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Factors to Improve Oral Cancer Screening Uptake: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Fatemeh Vida Zohoori
  • Kamini Shah
  • Julie Mason
  • Janet Shucksmith

Abstract

Aims: To engage with high risk groups to identify knowledge and awareness of oral cancer signs and symptoms and the factors likely to contribute to improved screening uptake. Methods: Focus group discussions were undertaken with 18 males; 40+ years of age; smokers and/or drinkers (15+ cigarettes per day and/or 15+ units of alcohol per week), irregular dental attenders living in economically deprived areas of Teesside. Results: There was a striking reported lack of knowledge and awareness of oral cancer and its signs and symptoms among the participants. When oral/mouth cancer leaflets produced by Cancer Research UK were presented to the participants, they claimed that they would seek help on noticing such a condition. There was a preference to seek help from their general practitioner rather than their dentist due to perceptions that a dentist is ‘inaccessible’ on a physical and psychological level, costly, a ‘tooth specialist’ not a ‘mouth specialist’, and also not able to prescribe medication and make referrals to specialists. Interestingly, none of the 18 participants who were offered a free oral cancer examination at a dental practice took up this offer. Conclusions: The uptake of oral cancer screening may be improved by increasing knowledge of the existence and signs and symptoms of oral cancer. Other factors that may increase uptake are increased awareness of the role of dentists in diagnosing oral cancer, promotion of oral cancer screening by health professionals during routine health checks, and the use of a “health” screening setting as opposed to a “dental” setting for such checks.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatemeh Vida Zohoori & Kamini Shah & Julie Mason & Janet Shucksmith, 2012. "Identifying Factors to Improve Oral Cancer Screening Uptake: A Qualitative Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-6, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0047410
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047410&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0047410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Chapman & Ross MacKenzie, 2010. "The Global Research Neglect of Unassisted Smoking Cessation: Causes and Consequences," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dechao Qiu & Ting Chen & Taiyi Liu & Fujian Song, 2020. "Smoking cessation and related factors in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: Evidence from a longitudinal study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Ward, Paul Russell & Muller, Robert & Tsourtos, George & Hersh, Deborah & Lawn, Sharon & Winefield, Anthony H. & Coveney, John, 2011. "Additive and subtractive resilience strategies as enablers of biographical reinvention: A qualitative study of ex-smokers and never-smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1140-1148, April.
    3. Kylie Morphett & Brad Partridge & Coral Gartner & Adrian Carter & Wayne Hall, 2015. "Why Don’t Smokers Want Help to Quit? A Qualitative Study of Smokers’ Attitudes towards Assisted vs. Unassisted Quitting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Zhi-Ming Mai & Sai-Yin Ho & Man-Ping Wang & Lai-Ming Ho & Tai-Hing Lam, 2018. "Living with Smoker(s) and Smoking Cessation in Chinese Adult Smokers: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Evidence from Hong Kong Population Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, January.
    5. Alos Ferrer, Carlos, 2013. "Think, but Not Too Much: A Dual-Process Model of Willpower and Self-Control," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 80019, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0047410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.