IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0014149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjusting Mortality for Loss to Follow-Up: Analysis of Five ART Programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Martin W G Brinkhof
  • Ben D Spycher
  • Constantin Yiannoutsos
  • Ralf Weigel
  • Robin Wood
  • Eugène Messou
  • Andrew Boulle
  • Matthias Egger
  • Jonathan A C Sterne
  • for the International epidemiological Database to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA)

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) programmes in sub-Saharan Africa is difficult because many patients are lost to follow-up. Outcomes in these patients are generally unknown but studies tracing patients have shown mortality to be high. We adjusted programme-level mortality in the first year of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for excess mortality in patients lost to follow-up. Methods and Findings: Treatment-naïve patients starting combination ART in five programmes in Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Malawi and South Africa were eligible. Patients whose last visit was at least nine months before the closure of the database were considered lost to follow-up. We filled missing survival times in these patients by multiple imputation, using estimates of mortality from studies that traced patients lost to follow-up. Data were analyzed using Weibull models, adjusting for age, sex, ART regimen, CD4 cell count, clinical stage and treatment programme. A total of 15,915 HIV-infected patients (median CD4 cell count 110 cells/µL, median age 35 years, 68% female) were included; 1,001 (6.3%) were known to have died and 1,285 (14.3%) were lost to follow-up in the first year of ART. Crude estimates of mortality at one year ranged from 5.7% (95% CI 4.9–6.5%) to 10.9% (9.6–12.4%) across the five programmes. Estimated mortality hazard ratios comparing patients lost to follow-up with those remaining in care ranged from 6 to 23. Adjusted estimates based on these hazard ratios ranged from 10.2% (8.9–11.6%) to 16.9% (15.0–19.1%), with relative increases in mortality ranging from 27% to 73% across programmes. Conclusions: Naïve survival analysis ignoring excess mortality in patients lost to follow-up may greatly underestimate overall mortality, and bias ART programme evaluations. Adjusted mortality estimates can be obtained based on excess mortality rates in patients lost to follow-up.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin W G Brinkhof & Ben D Spycher & Constantin Yiannoutsos & Ralf Weigel & Robin Wood & Eugène Messou & Andrew Boulle & Matthias Egger & Jonathan A C Sterne & for the International epidemiological D, 2010. "Adjusting Mortality for Loss to Follow-Up: Analysis of Five ART Programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-6, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0014149
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014149
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014149&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0014149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin W G Brinkhof & Mar Pujades-Rodriguez & Matthias Egger, 2009. "Mortality of Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Antiretroviral Treatment Programmes in Resource-Limited Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 333-342, June.
    3. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Rejoinder to Discussions on Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 351-353, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Menggang Yu, 2016. "Improving estimation efficiency for semi-competing risks data with partially observed terminal event," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 860-874, October.
    2. Richard J. Cook & Jerald F. Lawless, 2020. "Failure time studies with intermittent observation and losses to follow‐up," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1035-1063, December.
    3. Julie Henriques & Mar Pujades-Rodriguez & Megan McGuire & Elisabeth Szumilin & Jean Iwaz & Jean-François Etard & René Ecochard, 2012. "Comparison of Methods to Correct Survival Estimates and Survival Regression Analysis on a Large HIV African Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7, February.
    4. Menggang Yu & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2015. "Marginal and Conditional Distribution Estimation from Double-sampled Semi-competing Risks Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 87-103, March.
    5. Tianchen Qian & Constantine Frangakis & Constantin Yiannoutsos, 2020. "Deductive Semiparametric Estimation in Double-Sampling Designs with Application to PEPFAR," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 417-445, December.
    6. Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Discussion of Double Sampling for Survival Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 348-350, June.
    7. Vernon T. Farewell & Jerald F. Lawless & Dafna D. Gladman & Murray B. Urowitz, 2003. "Tracing studies and analysis of the effect of loss to follow‐up on mortality estimation from patient registry data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 445-456, October.
    8. Constantine E. Frangakis & Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Compliance Subsampling Designs for Comparative Research: Estimation and Optimal Planning," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 899-908, September.
    9. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    10. Stephanie A. Kovalchik & Steven C. Martino & Rebecca L. Collins & William G. Shadel & Elizabeth J. D’Amico & Kirsten Becker, 2018. "Scaled Inverse Probability Weighting: A Method to Assess Potential Bias Due to Event Nonreporting in Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(3), pages 354-381, June.
    11. Ming-Wen An & Constantine E. Frangakis & Beverly S. Musick & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2009. "The Need for Double-Sampling Designs in Survival Studies: An Application to Monitor PEPFAR," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 301-306, March.
    12. Chih‐Yuan Hsu & Chen‐Hsin Chen & Ken‐Ning Hsu & Ya‐Hung Lu, 2019. "A useful design utilizing the information fraction in a group sequential clinical trial with censored survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 133-143, March.
    13. Agnes N Kiragga & Barbara Castelnuovo & Rachel Musomba & Jonathan Levin & Andrew Kambugu & Yukari C Manabe & Constantin T Yiannoutsos & Noah Kiwanuka, 2013. "Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    14. Ingrid V Bassett & Darshini Govindasamy & Alison S Erlwanger & Emily P Hyle & Katharina Kranzer & Nienke van Schaik & Farzad Noubary & A David Paltiel & Robin Wood & Rochelle P Walensky & Elena Losina, 2014. "Mobile HIV Screening in Cape Town, South Africa: Clinical Impact, Cost and Cost-Effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Fan Li & Constantine E. Frangakis, 2006. "Polydesigns and Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 343-351, June.
    16. James H McMahon & Julian H Elliott & Steven Y Hong & Silvia Bertagnolio & Michael R Jordan, 2013. "Effects of Physical Tracing on Estimates of Loss to Follow-Up, Mortality and Retention in Low and Middle Income Country Antiretroviral Therapy Programs: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, February.
    17. April D. Kimmel & Daniel W. Fitzgerald & Jean W. Pape & Bruce R. Schackman, 2015. "Performance of a Mathematical Model to Forecast Lives Saved from HIV Treatment Expansion in Resource-Limited Settings," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(2), pages 230-242, February.
    18. Thomas N Nissen & Michala V Rose & Godfather Kimaro & Ib C Bygbjerg & Sayoki G Mfinanga & Pernille Ravn, 2012. "Challenges of Loss to Follow-up in Tuberculosis Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-8, July.
    19. Hannock Tweya & Caryl Feldacker & Janne Estill & Andreas Jahn & Wingston Ng’ambi & Anne Ben-Smith & Olivia Keiser & Mphatso Bokosi & Matthias Egger & Colin Speight & Joe Gumulira & Sam Phiri, 2013. "Are They Really Lost? “True” Status and Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation among HIV Infected Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy Considered Lost to Follow Up in Urban Malawi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    20. Janne Estill & Matthias Egger & Leigh F Johnson & Thomas Gsponer & Gilles Wandeler & Mary-Ann Davies & Andrew Boulle & Robin Wood & Daniela Garone & Jeffrey S A Stringer & Timothy B Hallett & Olivia K, 2013. "Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy and Mortality in HIV Programmes in Malawi, South Africa and Zambia: Mathematical Modelling Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-8, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0014149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.