IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0008845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processivity and Coupling in Messenger RNA Transcription

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Aitken
  • Marie-Cécile Robert
  • Ross D Alexander
  • Igor Goryanin
  • Edouard Bertrand
  • Jean D Beggs

Abstract

Background: The complexity of messenger RNA processing is now being uncovered by experimental techniques that are capable of detecting individual copies of mRNA in cells, and by quantitative real-time observations that reveal the kinetics. This processing is commonly modelled by permitting mRNA to be transcribed only when the promoter is in the on state. In this simple on/off model, the many processes involved in active transcription are represented by a single reaction. These processes include elongation, which has a minimum time for completion and processing that is not captured in the model. Methodology: In this paper, we explore the impact on the mRNA distribution of representing the elongation process in more detail. Consideration of the mechanisms of elongation leads to two alternative models of the coupling between the elongating polymerase and the state of the promoter: Processivity allows polymerases to complete elongation irrespective of the promoter state, whereas coupling requires the promoter to be active to produce a full-length transcript. We demonstrate that these alternatives have a significant impact on the predicted distributions. Models are simulated by the Gillespie algorithm, and the third and fourth moments of the resulting distribution are computed in order to characterise the length of the tail, and sharpness of the peak. By this methodology, we show that the moments provide a concise summary of the distribution, showing statistically-significant differences across much of the feasible parameter range. Conclusions: We conclude that processivity is not fully consistent with the on/off model unless the probability of successfully completing elongation is low—as has been observed. The results also suggest that some form of coupling between the promoter and a rate-limiting step in transcription may explain the cell's inability to maintain high mRNA levels at low noise—a prediction of the on/off model that has no supporting evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Aitken & Marie-Cécile Robert & Ross D Alexander & Igor Goryanin & Edouard Bertrand & Jean D Beggs, 2010. "Processivity and Coupling in Messenger RNA Transcription," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008845
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008845
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008845&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0008845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John R. S. Newman & Sina Ghaemmaghami & Jan Ihmels & David K. Breslow & Matthew Noble & Joseph L. DeRisi & Jonathan S. Weissman, 2006. "Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7095), pages 840-846, June.
    2. Arjun Raj & Charles S Peskin & Daniel Tranchina & Diana Y Vargas & Sanjay Tyagi, 2006. "Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Dmitri Volfson & Jennifer Marciniak & William J. Blake & Natalie Ostroff & Lev S. Tsimring & Jeff Hasty, 2006. "Origins of extrinsic variability in eukaryotic gene expression," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7078), pages 861-864, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc S Sherman & Barak A Cohen, 2014. "A Computational Framework for Analyzing Stochasticity in Gene Expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0008432 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:plo:pcbi00:1000506 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:plo:pbio00:1000115 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Abhyudai Singh & Mohammad Soltani, 2013. "Quantifying Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variability in Stochastic Gene Expression Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Arjun Raj & Charles S Peskin & Daniel Tranchina & Diana Y Vargas & Sanjay Tyagi, 2006. "Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Benjamin B Kaufmann & Qiong Yang & Jerome T Mettetal & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2007. "Heritable Stochastic Switching Revealed by Single-Cell Genealogy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.
    8. Mohammad Soltani & Cesar A Vargas-Garcia & Duarte Antunes & Abhyudai Singh, 2016. "Intercellular Variability in Protein Levels from Stochastic Expression and Noisy Cell Cycle Processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Roswitha Dolcemascolo & Lucas Goiriz & Roser Montagud-Martínez & Guillermo Rodrigo, 2022. "Gene regulation by a protein translation factor at the single-cell level," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Niraj Kumar & Abhyudai Singh & Rahul V Kulkarni, 2015. "Transcriptional Bursting in Gene Expression: Analytical Results for General Stochastic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Lee, Julian, 2023. "Poisson distributions in stochastic dynamics of gene expression: What events do they count?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).
    12. Louis-François Handfield & Yolanda T Chong & Jibril Simmons & Brenda J Andrews & Alan M Moses, 2013. "Unsupervised Clustering of Subcellular Protein Expression Patterns in High-Throughput Microscopy Images Reveals Protein Complexes and Functional Relationships between Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Singh, Abhyudai & Vahdat, Zahra & Xu, Zikai, 2019. "Time-triggered stochastic hybrid systems with two timer-dependent resets," OSF Preprints u8fzg, Center for Open Science.
    14. Muir Morrison & Manuel Razo-Mejia & Rob Phillips, 2021. "Reconciling kinetic and thermodynamic models of bacterial transcription," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Fu Audrey Qiuyan & Pachter Lior, 2016. "Estimating intrinsic and extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression measurements," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(6), pages 447-471, December.
    16. Rajesh Ramaswamy & Ivo F Sbalzarini & Nélido González-Segredo, 2011. "Noise-Induced Modulation of the Relaxation Kinetics around a Non-Equilibrium Steady State of Non-Linear Chemical Reaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, January.
    17. Anton J M Larsson & Christoph Ziegenhain & Michael Hagemann-Jensen & Björn Reinius & Tina Jacob & Tim Dalessandri & Gert-Jan Hendriks & Maria Kasper & Rickard Sandberg, 2021. "Transcriptional bursts explain autosomal random monoallelic expression and affect allelic imbalance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Chen, Aimin & Tian, Tianhai & Chen, Yiren & Zhou, Tianshou, 2022. "Stochastic analysis of a complex gene-expression model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Alan Veliz-Cuba & Andrew J Hirning & Adam A Atanas & Faiza Hussain & Flavia Vancia & Krešimir Josić & Matthew R Bennett, 2015. "Sources of Variability in a Synthetic Gene Oscillator," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Zachary R Fox & Brian Munsky, 2019. "The finite state projection based Fisher information matrix approach to estimate information and optimize single-cell experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    21. repec:plo:pone00:0143867 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Jonathan Liu & Donald Hansen & Elizabeth Eck & Yang Joon Kim & Meghan Turner & Simon Alamos & Hernan G Garcia, 2021. "Real-time single-cell characterization of the eukaryotic transcription cycle reveals correlations between RNA initiation, elongation, and cleavage," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, May.
    23. Pranidhi Sood & Robert J Johnston Jr. & Edo Kussell, 2012. "Stochastic De-repression of Rhodopsins in Single Photoreceptors of the Fly Retina," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.
    24. William C. W. Chen & Leonid Gaidukov & Yong Lai & Ming-Ru Wu & Jicong Cao & Michael J. Gutbrod & Gigi C. G. Choi & Rachel P. Utomo & Ying-Chou Chen & Liliana Wroblewska & Manolis Kellis & Lin Zhang & , 2022. "A synthetic transcription platform for programmable gene expression in mammalian cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.