IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shortages of benzathine penicillin for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: An evaluation from multi-country surveys and stakeholder interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Nurse-Findlay
  • Melanie M Taylor
  • Margaret Savage
  • Maeve B Mello
  • Sanni Saliyou
  • Manuel Lavayen
  • Frederic Seghers
  • Michael L Campbell
  • Françoise Birgirimana
  • Leopold Ouedraogo
  • Morkor Newman Owiredu
  • Nancy Kidula
  • Lee Pyne-Mercier

Abstract

Background: Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the only recommended treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission of syphilis. Due to recent reports of country-level shortages of BPG, an evaluation was undertaken to quantify countries that have experienced shortages in the past 2 years and to describe factors contributing to these shortages. Methods and findings: Country-level data about BPG shortages were collected using 3 survey approaches. First, a survey designed by the WHO Department of Reproductive Health and Research was distributed to 41 countries and territories in the Americas and 41 more in Africa. Second, WHO conducted an email survey of 28 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention country directors. An additional 13 countries were in contact with WHO for related congenital syphilis prevention activities and also reported on BPG shortages. Third, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) collected data from 14 countries (where it has active operations) to understand the extent of stock-outs, in-country purchasing, usage behavior, and breadth of available purchasing options to identify stock-outs worldwide. CHAI also conducted in-person interviews in the same 14 countries to understand the extent of stock-outs, in-country purchasing and usage behavior, and available purchasing options. CHAI also completed a desk review of 10 additional high-income countries, which were also included. BPG shortages were attributable to shortfalls in supply, demand, and procurement in the countries assessed. This assessment should not be considered globally representative as countries not surveyed may also have experienced BPG shortages. Country contacts may not have been aware of BPG shortages when surveyed or may have underreported medication substitutions due to desirability bias. Funding for the purchase of BPG by countries was not evaluated. In all, 114 countries and territories were approached to provide information on BPG shortages occurring during 2014–2016. Of unique countries and territories, 95 (83%) responded or had information evaluable from public records. Of these 95 countries and territories, 39 (41%) reported a BPG shortage, and 56 (59%) reported no BPG shortage; 10 (12%) countries with and without BPG shortages reported use of antibiotic alternatives to BPG for treatment of maternal syphilis. Market exits, inflexible production cycles, and minimum order quantities affect BPG supply. On the demand side, inaccurate forecasts and sole sourcing lead to under-procurement. Clinicians may also incorrectly prescribe BPG substitutes due to misperceptions of quality or of the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Targets for improvement include drug forecasting and procurement, and addressing provider reluctance to use BPG. Opportunities to improve global supply, demand, and use of BPG should be prioritized alongside congenital syphilis elimination efforts. Using country-level surveys and stakeholder interviews, Stephen Nurse-Findlay and colleagues investigate the global frequency of benzathine penicillin shortages and uncover commonly noted causes.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Nurse-Findlay & Melanie M Taylor & Margaret Savage & Maeve B Mello & Sanni Saliyou & Manuel Lavayen & Frederic Seghers & Michael L Campbell & Françoise Birgirimana & Leopold Ouedraogo & Morkor, 2017. "Shortages of benzathine penicillin for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: An evaluation from multi-country surveys and stakeholder interviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002473
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002473&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Talita Katiane de Brito Pinto & Aliete Cristina Gomes Dias Pedrosa da Cunha-Oliveira & Ana Isabela Lopes Sales-Moioli & Jane Francinete Dantas & Rosângela Maria Morais da Costa & José Paulo Silva Mour, 2022. "Clinical Protocols and Treatment Guidelines for the Management of Maternal and Congenital Syphilis in Brazil and Portugal: Analysis and Comparisons: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Gotham, Dzintars & Moja, Lorenzo & van der Heijden, Maarten & Paulin, Sarah & Smith, Ingrid & Beyer, Peter, 2021. "Reimbursement models to tackle market failures for antimicrobials: Approaches taken in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 296-306.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.