IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10513-d895846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Protocols and Treatment Guidelines for the Management of Maternal and Congenital Syphilis in Brazil and Portugal: Analysis and Comparisons: A Narrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Talita Katiane de Brito Pinto

    (Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil
    Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3001-901 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Aliete Cristina Gomes Dias Pedrosa da Cunha-Oliveira

    (Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3001-901 Coimbra, Portugal
    Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of the 20th Century (CEIS-20), University of Coimbra, 3000-186 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Ana Isabela Lopes Sales-Moioli

    (Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil)

  • Jane Francinete Dantas

    (Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil
    Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of the 20th Century (CEIS-20), University of Coimbra, 3000-186 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Rosângela Maria Morais da Costa

    (Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil
    Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of the 20th Century (CEIS-20), University of Coimbra, 3000-186 Coimbra, Portugal
    Municipal Health Department, Natal City Hall, Natal 59014-030, Brazil)

  • José Paulo Silva Moura

    (Doctor Daniel de Matos Maternity, Coimbra Hospital and University Center, 3000-157 Coimbra, Portugal
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-370 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino

    (Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, Toledo Campus, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • Ricardo Alexsandro de Medeiros Valentim

    (Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil)

Abstract

(1) Background: Maternal syphilis (MS) and congenital syphilis (CS) are serious public health problems worldwide due to their high morbidity and mortality rates. (2) Objective: Evaluating the applicability of Clinical Protocols and Treatment Guidelines on case incidence trends in Brazil and Portugal. (3) Methods: The review was done through bibliographic research in two public databases and government websites from both countries, published between 2007 and 2022. All guidelines that contained CS and MS were selected. (4) Results and discussion: After evaluation, we found that Brazil and Portugal have adequate protocols for screening and treating congenital and maternal syphilis. (5) Conclusion: The results suggest that CS and MS incidence are notably higher in Brazil than in Portugal due to economic, cultural, and social disparities and the differences in territory size. Therefore, these demographic and socioeconomic factors could strongly influence efforts to fight against syphilis and thus control the infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Talita Katiane de Brito Pinto & Aliete Cristina Gomes Dias Pedrosa da Cunha-Oliveira & Ana Isabela Lopes Sales-Moioli & Jane Francinete Dantas & Rosângela Maria Morais da Costa & José Paulo Silva Mour, 2022. "Clinical Protocols and Treatment Guidelines for the Management of Maternal and Congenital Syphilis in Brazil and Portugal: Analysis and Comparisons: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10513-:d:895846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shangqing Tang & Lishuo Shi & Wen Chen & Peizhen Zhao & Heping Zheng & Bin Yang & Cheng Wang & Li Ling, 2021. "Spatiotemporal distribution and sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors associated with primary and secondary syphilis in Guangdong, China, 2005–2017," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Stephen Nurse-Findlay & Melanie M Taylor & Margaret Savage & Maeve B Mello & Sanni Saliyou & Manuel Lavayen & Frederic Seghers & Michael L Campbell & Françoise Birgirimana & Leopold Ouedraogo & Morkor, 2017. "Shortages of benzathine penicillin for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: An evaluation from multi-country surveys and stakeholder interviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Aliete Cunha-Oliveira & Ana Paula Camarneiro & Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino & Carmen Cipriano-Crespo & Paulo Joaquim Pina Queirós & Daniela Cardoso & Diana Gabriela Santos & María Idoia Ugarte-Gurrutxaga, 2021. "The Integration of Gender Perspective into Young People’s Sexuality Education in Spain and Portugal: Legislation and Educational Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-27, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janmilli da Costa Dantas & Cristiane da Silva Ramos Marinho & Yago Tavares Pinheiro & Richardson Augusto Rosendo da Silva, 2022. "Temporal Trend of Gestational Syphilis between 2008 and 2018 in Brazil: Association with Socioeconomic and Health Care Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Jordana Crislayne de Lima Paiva & Sara Dias-Trindade & Mario Orestes Aguirre Gonzalez & Daniele Montenegro da Silva Barros & Pablo Holanda Cardoso & Pedro Henrique Castro Bezerra & Thaisa Gois Farias , 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of Communication Campaigns under the Project “Syphilis No”: A National Tool for Inducing and Promoting Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Talita Brito & Thaísa Lima & Aliete Cunha-Oliveira & André Noronha & Cintia Brito & Fernando Farias & Sedir Morais & Jailton Paiva & Cintia Honorato & Paulo Queirós & Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino & Márcia, 2023. "Salus Platform: A Digital Health Solution Tool for Managing Syphilis Cases in Brazil—A Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gotham, Dzintars & Moja, Lorenzo & van der Heijden, Maarten & Paulin, Sarah & Smith, Ingrid & Beyer, Peter, 2021. "Reimbursement models to tackle market failures for antimicrobials: Approaches taken in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 296-306.
    2. Ruonan Wang & Xiaolong Li & Zengyun Hu & Wenjun Jing & Yu Zhao, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Its Influencing Factors of Syphilis in Ningxia, Northwest China, from 2004 to 2017: A Spatial Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Zbigniew Izdebski & Joanna Dec-Pietrowska & Alicja Kozakiewicz & Joanna Mazur, 2022. "What One Gets Is Not Always What One Wants—Young Adults’ Perception of Sexuality Education in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Francisco Javier Jiménez-Ríos & Gracia González-Gijón & Nazaret Martínez-Heredia & Ana Amaro Agudo, 2023. "Sex Education and Comprehensive Health Education in the Future of Educational Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-9, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10513-:d:895846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.