Author
Listed:
- Andrew K Wills
- Debbie A Lawlor
- Fiona E Matthews
- Avan Aihie Sayer
- Eleni Bakra
- Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Michaela Benzeval
- Eric Brunner
- Rachel Cooper
- Mika Kivimaki
- Diana Kuh
- Graciela Muniz-Terrera
- Rebecca Hardy
Abstract
Analysis of eight population-based and occupational cohorts from the UK reveals the patterns of change of blood pressure in the population through the life course.Background: Much of our understanding of the age-related progression of systolic blood pressure (SBP) comes from cross-sectional data, which do not directly capture within-individual change. We estimated life course trajectories of SBP using longitudinal data from seven population-based cohorts and one predominantly white collar occupational cohort, each from the United Kingdom and with data covering different but overlapping age periods. Methods and Findings: Data are from 30,372 individuals and comprise 102,583 SBP observations spanning from age 7 to 80+y. Multilevel models were fitted to each cohort. Four life course phases were evident in both sexes: a rapid increase in SBP coinciding with peak adolescent growth, a more gentle increase in early adulthood, a midlife acceleration beginning in the fourth decade, and a period of deceleration in late adulthood where increases in SBP slowed and SBP eventually declined. These phases were still present, although at lower levels, after adjusting for increases in body mass index though adulthood. The deceleration and decline in old age was less evident after excluding individuals who had taken antihypertensive medication. Compared to the population-based cohorts, the occupational cohort had a lower mean SBP, a shallower annual increase in midlife, and a later midlife acceleration. The maximum sex difference was found at age 26 (+8.2 mm Hg higher in men, 95% CI: 6.7, 9.8); women then experienced steeper rises and caught up by the seventh decade. Conclusions: Our investigation shows a general pattern of SBP progression from childhood in the UK, and suggests possible differences in this pattern during adulthood between a general population and an occupational population. : Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Background: About a third of US and UK adults have high blood pressure (hypertension). Although hypertension has no obvious symptoms, it can lead to life-threatening heart attacks, stroke, and other forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is diagnosed by measuring blood pressure—the force that blood moving around the body exerts on the inside of large blood vessels. Blood pressure is highest when the heart is pumping out blood (systolic blood pressure [SBP]) and lowest when the heart is re-filling with blood (diastolic blood pressure [DBP]). Normal adult blood pressure is defined as an SBP of less than 130 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) and a DBP of less than 85 mm Hg (a blood pressure of 130/85). A reading of more than 140/90 indicates hypertension. Many factors affect blood pressure, but overweight people and individuals who eat fatty or salty food are at high risk of developing hypertension. Moreover, blood pressure tends to increase with age. Mild hypertension can often be corrected by making lifestyle changes, but many people take antihypertensive drugs to reduce their blood pressure. Why Was This Study Done?: Several trials have indicated that SBP is an important, modifiable risk factor for CVD. But, to determine the best way to prevent CVD, it is important to understand how SBP changes through life and how lifestyle factors affect this age-related progression. Textbook descriptions of age-related changes in SBP are based on studies that measured SBP at a single time point in groups (cohorts) of people of different ages. However, such “cross-sectional” studies do not capture within-individual changes in SBP and may be affected by environmental effects related to specific historical periods. The best way to measure age-related changes in SBP is through longitudinal studies in which SBP is repeatedly measured over many years in a single cohort. Such studies are underway, but it will be some decades before individuals in these studies reach old age. In this study, therefore, the researchers use data from multiple UK cohorts that had repeated SBP measurements taken over different but overlapping periods of life to investigate the life course trajectory of SBP. What Did the Researchers Do and Find?: The researchers used statistical models to analyze data from longitudinal studies of SBP in seven population-based cohorts (the participants were randomly chosen from the general population) and in one occupational cohort (civil servants). SBP measurements were available for 30,372 individuals with ages spanning from seven years to more than 80 years. The researchers' analysis revealed four phases of SBP change in both sexes: a rapid increase in SBP during adolescent growth, a gentler increase in early adulthood, a midlife acceleration beginning in the fourth decade of life, and a period in late adulthood when SBP increases slowed and then reversed. This last phase was less marked when people taking antihypertensive drugs were excluded from the analysis. After adjusting for increases in body mass index (a measure of body fat) during adulthood, the magnitude of the SBP age-related changes was similar but the average SBP at each age was lower. Compared to the population-based cohorts, the occupational cohort had a lower average SBP, a shallower annual increase in SBP, and a later midlife acceleration, possibly because of socially determined modifiable SBP-related factors such as diet and lifestyle. Finally, although women had lower SBPs in early adulthood than men, they experienced steeper midlife SBP rises (probably because of a menopause-related effect on salt sensitivity) so that by the seventh decade of life, men and women had similar average SBPs. What Do These Findings Mean?: These findings describe the general pattern of age-related progression of SBP from early childhood in the UK. The findings may not be generalizable because other populations may be exposed to different distributions of modifiable factors. In addition, their accuracy may be affected by differences between cohorts in how SBP was measured. Nevertheless, these findings—in particular, the slower midlife increase in SBP in the occupational cohort than in the population-based cohorts—suggest that the key determinants of age-related increases in blood pressure are modifiable and could be targeted for CVD prevention. Further research is now needed to identify exactly which factors affect the life course trajectory of SBP and to discover when these factors have their greatest influence on SBP. Additional Information: Please access these Web sites via the online version of this summary at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000440.
Suggested Citation
Andrew K Wills & Debbie A Lawlor & Fiona E Matthews & Avan Aihie Sayer & Eleni Bakra & Yoav Ben-Shlomo & Michaela Benzeval & Eric Brunner & Rachel Cooper & Mika Kivimaki & Diana Kuh & Graciela Muniz-T, 2011.
"Life Course Trajectories of Systolic Blood Pressure Using Longitudinal Data from Eight UK Cohorts,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:1000440
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000440
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Singh-Manoux, A. & Guéguen, A. & Ferrie, J. & Shipley, M. & Martikainen, P. & Bonenfant, S. & Goldberg, M. & Marmot, M., 2008.
"Gender differences in the association between morbidity and mortality among middle-aged men and women,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(12), pages 2251-2257.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Beata Gavurova & Viera Ivankova & Martin Rigelsky & Ladislav Suhanyi, 2020.
"Impact of Gender Inequalities in the Causes of Mortality on the Competitiveness of OECD Countries,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
- Robert Stefko & Beata Gavurova & Viera Ivankova & Martin Rigelsky, 2020.
"Gender Inequalities in Health and Their Effect on the Economic Prosperity Represented by the GDP of Selected Developed Countries—Empirical Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
- Ballering, Aranka V. & Bonvanie, Irma J. & Olde Hartman, Tim C. & Monden, Rei & Rosmalen, Judith G.M., 2020.
"Gender and sex independently associate with common somatic symptoms and lifetime prevalence of chronic disease,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
- M.D. Azharuddin Akhtar & Nadeem Ahmad & Indrani Roy Chowdhury, 2020.
"Measuring Socio-Economic Inequality in Self-Reported Morbidity in India: Decomposition Analysis,"
Review of Development and Change, , vol. 25(1), pages 89-111, June.
- Luis Miguel Bello-Lujan & Jose Antonio Serrano-Sanchez & Juan Jose Gonzalez-Henriquez, 2022.
"Stable Gender Gap and Similar Gender Trend in Chronic Morbidities between 1997–2015 in Adult Canary Population,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
- Nicholson, Amanda & Rose, Richard & Bobak, Martin, 2009.
"Association between attendance at religious services and self-reported health in 22 European countries,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 519-528, August.
- Sadig, Husam, 2014.
"Unknown eligibility whilst weighting for non-response: the puzzle of who has died and who is still alive?,"
ISER Working Paper Series
2014-35, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
- Patrizio Vanella & Christina Benita Wilke & Doris Söhnlein, 2022.
"Prevalence and Economic Costs of Absenteeism in an Aging Population—A Quasi-Stochastic Projection for Germany,"
Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, March.
- M. Angeles Zulueta & Gisela Cantos-Mateos & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Carmen Sánchez, 2011.
"Research involving women and health in the Medline database, 1965–2005: co-term analysis and visualization of main lines of research,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 679-706, September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1000440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.