IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of photovoice on mental health and stigma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Adeniyi Adeboye
  • Ugochukwu Aghalu
  • Whitney Onuorah
  • Chizor Samuel-Nwokeji
  • Chimaobi Nwanguma
  • Adekunle Akerele
  • Judy Wasige

Abstract

Photovoice is a transformative tool for improving health outcomes among people living with mental ill-health (PLWMI), fostering empowerment and social change. Only one meta-analysis has evaluated the effectiveness of photovoice for mental health outcomes. However, the study focused on various health conditions and only addressed two mental health outcomes. With an exclusive focus on mental health and stigma, this meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of photovoice’s impact on eight mental health and stigma-related outcomes in PLWMI and healthcare providers (HCPs). The study included seven randomised control trials (Sample size (n)=754), retrieved from electronic databases including Cochrane Trials, CINAHL Plus, ProQuest, Medline, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar, published between 2013 and 2023. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate effect sizes (Cohen’s d (d)). The study protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023476867). Results showed significant improvements in mental health outcomes for PLWMI. Photovoice led to reductions in social withdrawal (n = 318; d, 95% CI = -0.20, -0.41 to 0.00) and depression (n = 267; d, 95% CI = -0.23, -0.45 to -0.02). Additionally, it increased self-efficacy (n = 267; d, 95% CI = 0.22, 0.00 to 0.44) and recovery (n = 285; d, 95% CI = 0.19, -0.02 to 0.41). However, there was a decrease in stigma resistance (n = 318; d, 95% CI = -0.13, -0.36 to 0.10). Among HCPs, there were significant improvements in both stigma and mental health-related outcomes, with reductions in anger (n = 330; d, 95% CI = -1.05, -2.79 to 0.69), social distance (n = 418; d, 95% CI = -1.41, -3.02 to 1.03), and the perception of danger (n = 115; d, 95% CI = -1.80, -5.04 to 1.44). The findings highlight the potential of photovoice as an effective intervention for improving mental health outcomes and reducing stigma in both PLWMI and HCPs. Consequently, photovoice can play a crucial role in enhancing the well-being of PLWMI and in transforming HCP attitudes within healthcare settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeniyi Adeboye & Ugochukwu Aghalu & Whitney Onuorah & Chizor Samuel-Nwokeji & Chimaobi Nwanguma & Adekunle Akerele & Judy Wasige, 2025. "The impact of photovoice on mental health and stigma: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004272
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004272
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004272&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rowena Jacobs, 2009. "Investigating Patient Outcome Measures in Mental Health," Working Papers 048cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anika Reichert & Rowena Jacobs, 2018. "The impact of waiting time on patient outcomes: Evidence from early intervention in psychosis services in England," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(11), pages 1772-1787, November.
    2. Matthew Franklin & Clara Mukuria & Brendan Mulhern & Irwin Tran & John Brazier & Stuart Watson, 2019. "Measuring the Burden of Schizophrenia Using Clinician and Patient-Reported Measures: An Exploratory Analysis of Construct Validity," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(4), pages 405-417, August.
    3. Ifigeneia Mavranezouli, 2010. "A Review and Critique of Studies Reporting Utility Values for Schizophrenia-Related Health States," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 28(12), pages 1109-1121, December.
    4. Mavranezouli, I & Brazier, JE & Young, Tracey A. & Barkham, M, 2009. "Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems," MPRA Paper 29849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ifigeneia Mavranezouli & John E. Brazier & Donna Rowen & Michael Barkham, 2013. "Estimating a Preference-Based Index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure (CORE-OM)," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(3), pages 381-395, April.
    6. Moran, Valerie & Jacobs, Rowena, 2015. "Comparing the performance of English mental health providers in achieving patient outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 127-135.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.