Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Naveed Noor
- Haider Safdar Abbasi
- Nina van Der Mark
- Zahida Azizullah
- Janice Linton
- Afifah Rahman-Shepherd
- Amna Rehana Siddiqui
- Mishal Sameer Khan
- Rumina Hasan
- Sadia Shakoor
Abstract
Incentive-linked prescribing (ILP) is considered a controversial practice universally. If incentivised, physicians may prioritise meeting pharmaceutical sales targets through prescriptions, rather than considering patients’ health and wellbeing. Despite the potential harms of ILP to patients and important stakeholders in the healthcare system, healthcare consumers (HCCs) which include patients and the general public often have far less awareness about the practice of pharmaceutical incentivisation of physicians. We conducted a scoping review to explore what existing research says about HCCs’ perceptions of the financial relationship between physicians and pharmaceutical companies. To conduct this scoping review, we followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework: identifying research questions, identifying relevant studies, selecting eligible studies, data charting, and collating, summarising, and reporting results. We also used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’ extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR), as a guide to organise the information in this review. Quantitative and qualitative studies with patients and the general public, published in the English language were identified through searches of Scopus, Medline (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), and Google Scholar. Three themes emerged through the analysis of the 13 eligible studies: understanding of incentivisation, perceptions of hazards linked to ILP, and HCCs’ suggestions to address it. We found documentation that HCCs exhibited a range of knowledge from good to insufficient about the pharmaceutical incentivisation of physicians. HCCs perceived several hazards linked to ILP such as a lack of trust in physicians and the healthcare system, the prescribing of unnecessary medications, and the negative effect on physicians’ reputations in society. In addition to strong regulatory controls, it is critical that physicians self-regulate their behaviour, and publicly disclose if they have any financial ties with pharmaceutical companies. Doing so can contribute to trust between patients and physicians, an important part of patient-focused care and a contributor to user confidence in the wider health system.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Naveed Noor & Haider Safdar Abbasi & Nina van Der Mark & Zahida Azizullah & Janice Linton & Afifah Rahman-Shepherd & Amna Rehana Siddiqui & Mishal Sameer Khan & Rumina Hasan & Sadia Shakoor, 2024.
"Healthcare consumers’ perceptions of incentive-linked prescribing: A scoping review,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-13, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003026
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003026
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Hong, Sounman & Ji, Suho & Kim, Byoung Jai & Park, Hyung Jun, 2024.
"Performance feedback in healthcare organizations: The role of accountability measures and competition,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
- Heinzel, Mirko & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2024.
"National action on antimicrobial resistance and the political economy of health care,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
122251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.