IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inverting the deficit model in global mental health: An examination of strengths and assets of community mental health care in Ghana, India, Occupied Palestinian territories, and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kaaren Mathias
  • Noah Bunkley
  • Pooja Pillai
  • Kenneth A Ae-Ngibise
  • Lily Kpobi
  • Dan Taylor
  • Kaustubh Joag
  • Meenal Rawat
  • Weeam Hammoudeh
  • Suzan Mitwalli
  • Ashraf Kagee
  • Andre van Rensburg
  • Dörte Bemme
  • Rochelle A Burgess
  • Sumeet Jain
  • Hanna Kienzler
  • Ursula M Read

Abstract

Global mental health [GMH] scholarship and practice has typically focused on the unmet needs and barriers to mental health in communities, developing biomedical and psychosocial interventions for integration into formal health care platforms in response. In this article, we analyse four diverse settings to disrupt the emphasises on health system weaknesses, treatment gaps and barriers which can perpetuate harmful hierarchies and colonial and medical assumptions, or a ‘deficit model’. We draw on the experiential knowledge of community mental health practitioners and researchers working in Ghana, India, the Occupied Palestinian Territory and South Africa to describe key assets existing in ‘informal’ community mental health care systems and how these are shaped by socio-political contexts. These qualitative case studies emerged from an online mutual learning process convened between 39 academic and community-based collaborators working in 24 countries who interrogated key tenets to inform a social paradigm for global mental health. Bringing together diverse expertise gained from professional practice and research, our sub-group explored the role of Community Mental Health Systems in GMH through comparative country case studies describing the features of community care beyond the health and social care system. We found that the socio-political health determinants of global economic structures in all four countries exert significant influence on local community health systems. We identified that key assets across sites included: family and community care, and support from non-profit organisations and religious and faith-based organisations. Strengthening community assets may promote reciprocal relationships between the formal and informal sectors, providing resources for support and training for communities while communities collaborate in the design and delivery of interventions rooted in localised expertise. This paper highlights the value of informal care, the unique social structures of each local context, and resources within local communities as key existing assets for mental health.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaaren Mathias & Noah Bunkley & Pooja Pillai & Kenneth A Ae-Ngibise & Lily Kpobi & Dan Taylor & Kaustubh Joag & Meenal Rawat & Weeam Hammoudeh & Suzan Mitwalli & Ashraf Kagee & Andre van Rensburg & Dö, 2024. "Inverting the deficit model in global mental health: An examination of strengths and assets of community mental health care in Ghana, India, Occupied Palestinian territories, and South Africa," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002575
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002575&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Jagoe & Caitlin McDonald & Minerva Rivas & Nora Groce, 2021. "Direct participation of people with communication disabilities in research on poverty and disabilities in low and middle income countries: A critical review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Tindana, P.O. & Rozmovits, L. & Boulanger, R.F. & Bandewar, S.V.S. & Aborigo, R.A. & Hodgson, A.V.O. & Kolopack, P. & Lavery, J.V., 2011. "Aligning community engagement with traditional authority structures in global health research: A case study from Northern Ghana," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(10), pages 1857-1867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fehr, Alexandra & Muela, Joan & Nieto-Sanchez, Claudia & Manneh, Ebrima & Baldeh, Dullo & Ceesay, Omar & Bardají, Azucena & Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun & Bunders-Aelen, Joske, 2021. "The role of social cohesion in the implementation and coverage of a mass drug administration trial for malaria control in the Gambia: An in-depth comparison of two intervention villages," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Marie‐Christine Brotherton, 2023. "Sustainability management and social license to operate in the extractive industry: The cross‐cultural gap with Indigenous communities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 125-137, February.
    3. Robert Kaba Alhassan & Edward Nketiah-Amponsah & Nicole Spieker & Daniel Kojo Arhinful & Tobias F Rinke de Wit, 2016. "Assessing the Impact of Community Engagement Interventions on Health Worker Motivation and Experiences with Clients in Primary Health Facilities in Ghana: A Randomized Cluster Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0209744 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.