IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentivisation practices and their influence on physicians’ prescriptions: A qualitative analysis of practice and policy in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Mishal Khan
  • Afifah Rahman-Shepherd
  • Muhammad Naveed Noor
  • Sabeen Sharif
  • Meherunissa Hamid
  • Wafa Aftab
  • Afshan Khurshid Isani
  • Robyna Irshad Khan
  • Rumina Hasan
  • Sadia Shakoor
  • Sameen Siddiqi

Abstract

Focus on profit-generating enterprise in healthcare can create conflicts of interest that adversely impact prescribing and pricing of medicines. Although a global challenge, addressing the impacts on quality of care is particularly difficult in countries where the pharmaceutical industry and physician lobby is strong relative to regulatory institutions. Our study characterises the range of incentives exchanged between the pharmaceutical industry and physicians, and investigates the differences between incentivisation practices and policies in Pakistan. In this mixed methods study, we first thematically analysed semi-structured interviews with 28 purposively selected for-profit primary-care physicians and 13 medical sales representatives from pharmaceutical companies working across Pakistan’s largest city, Karachi. We then conducted a content analysis of policies on ethical practice issued by two regulatory bodies responsible in Pakistan, and the World Health Organization. This enabled a systematic comparison of incentivisation practices with what is considered ‘prohibitive’ or ‘permissive’ in policy. Our findings demonstrate that incentivisation of physicians to meet pharmaceutical sales targets is the norm, and that both parties play in the symbiotic physician-pharma incentivisation dynamics. Further, we were able to categorise the types of incentive exchanged into one of five categories: financial, material, professional or educational, social or recreational, and familial. Our comparison of incentivisation practices with policies revealed three reasons for such widespread incentivisation linked to sales targets: first, some clear policies were being ignored by physicians; second, there are ambiguous or contradictory policies with respect to specific incentive types; and third, numerous incentive types are unaddressed by existing policies, such as pharmaceutical companies paying for private clinic renovations. There is a need for policies to be clarified and updated, and to build buy-in for policy enforcement from pharmaceutical companies and physicians, such that transgressions on target-driven prescribing are seen to be unethical.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishal Khan & Afifah Rahman-Shepherd & Muhammad Naveed Noor & Sabeen Sharif & Meherunissa Hamid & Wafa Aftab & Afshan Khurshid Isani & Robyna Irshad Khan & Rumina Hasan & Sadia Shakoor & Sameen Siddiq, 2023. "Incentivisation practices and their influence on physicians’ prescriptions: A qualitative analysis of practice and policy in Pakistan," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001890
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001890
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001890&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kara Hanson & Lucy Gilson & Catherine Goodman & Anne Mills & Richard Smith & Richard Feachem & Neelam Sekhri Feachem & Tracey Perez Koehlmoos & Heather Kinlaw, 2008. "Is Private Health Care the Answer to the Health Problems of the World's Poor?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-5, November.
    2. Peter Collignon & Prema-chandra Athukorala & Sanjaya Senanayake & Fahad Khan, 2015. "Antimicrobial Resistance: The Major Contribution of Poor Governance and Corruption to This Growing Problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felicia Robertson & Sverker C. Jagers & Björn Rönnerstrand, 2018. "Managing Sustainable Use of Antibiotics—The Role of Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Gordon Dugle & Stephen Debar Kpinpuo & Benjamin Baisie Ghartey, 2021. "From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 866-884, May.
    3. Ayako Honda & Amarech Obse, 2020. "Payment Arrangements for Private Healthcare Purchasing Under Publicly Funded Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Issues and Implications," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 811-823, December.
    4. Julia Ngozi Chukwuma, 2023. "Implementing Health Policy in Nigeria: The Basic Health Care Provision Fund as a Catalyst for Achieving Universal Health Coverage?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(6), pages 1480-1503, November.
    5. Heinzel, Mirko & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2024. "National action on antimicrobial resistance and the political economy of health care," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ljungqvist, Gunnar & van Kessel, Robin & Mossialos, Elias & Saint, Victoria & Schmidt, Jelena & Mafi, Alexander & Shutt, Alison & Chatterjee, Anuja & Charani, Esmita & Anderson, Michael, 2025. "Mapping socioeconomic factors driving antimicrobial resistance in humans: an umbrella review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127395, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Roberta Magnano San Lio & Giuliana Favara & Andrea Maugeri & Martina Barchitta & Antonella Agodi, 2023. "How Antimicrobial Resistance Is Linked to Climate Change: An Overview of Two Intertwined Global Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2017. "The Importance of Government Effectiveness for Transitions toward Greater Electrification in Developing Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Irene Anna Lambraki & Melanie Cousins & Tiscar Graells & Anaïs Léger & Patrik Henriksson & Stephan Harbarth & Max Troell & Didier Wernli & Peter Søgaard Jørgensen & Andrew P Desbois & Carolee A Carson, 2022. "Factors influencing antimicrobial resistance in the European food system and potential leverage points for intervention: A participatory, One Health study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Victoria Pattison de Menil & Martin Knapp & David McDaid & Frank Gitau Njenga, 2014. "Service Use, Charge, and Access to Mental Healthcare in a Private Kenyan Inpatient Setting: The Effects of Insurance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-7, March.
    11. Tvaliashvili, Mari & Sulaberidze, Lela & Goodman, Catherine & Hanson, Kara & Gotsadze, George, 2024. "Exploring the risks of fragmentation in health care markets – An analysis of inpatient care in Georgia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.