IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of multimorbidity in urban and rural Malawi: An interview study of burdens of treatment and lack of treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Edith F Chikumbu
  • Christopher Bunn
  • Stephen Kasenda
  • Albert Dube
  • Enita Phiri-Makwakwa
  • Bhautesh D Jani
  • Modu Jobe
  • Sally Wyke
  • Janet Seeley
  • Amelia C Crampin
  • Frances S Mair
  • on behalf of the MAfricaEE Project

Abstract

Multimorbidity (presence of ≥2 long term conditions (LTCs)) is a growing global health challenge, yet we know little about the experiences of those living with multimorbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We therefore explore: 1) experiences of men and women living with multimorbidity in urban and rural Malawi including their experiences of burden of treatment and 2) examine the utility of Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Burden of Treatment Theory (BOTT) for structuring analytical accounts of these experiences. We conducted in depth, semi-structured interviews with 32 people in rural (n = 16) and urban settings (n = 16); 16 males, 16 females; 15 under 50 years; and 17 over 50 years. Data were analysed thematically and then conceptualised through the lens of NPT and BOTT. Key elements of burden of treatment identified included: coming to terms with and gaining an understanding of life with multimorbidity; dealing with resulting disruptions to family life; the work of seeking family and community support; navigating healthcare systems; coping with lack of continuity of care; enacting self-management advice; negotiating medical advice; appraising treatments; and importantly, dealing with the burden of lack of treatments/services. Poverty and inadequate healthcare provision constrained capacity to deal with treatment burden while supportive social and community networks were important enabling features. Greater access to health information/education would lessen treatment burden as would better resourced healthcare systems and improved standards of living. Our work demonstrates the utility of NPT and BOTT for aiding conceptualisation of treatment burden issues in LMICs but our findings highlight that ‘lack’ of access to treatments or services is an important additional burden which must be integrated in accounts of treatment burden in LMICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Edith F Chikumbu & Christopher Bunn & Stephen Kasenda & Albert Dube & Enita Phiri-Makwakwa & Bhautesh D Jani & Modu Jobe & Sally Wyke & Janet Seeley & Amelia C Crampin & Frances S Mair & on behalf of , 2022. "Experiences of multimorbidity in urban and rural Malawi: An interview study of burdens of treatment and lack of treatment," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000139
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000139&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mbokazi, Nonzuzo & van Pinxteren, Myrna & Murphy, Katherine & Mair, Frances S. & May, Carl R. & Levitt, Naomi S., 2023. "Ubuntu as a mediator in coping with multimorbidity treatment burden in a disadvantaged rural and urban setting in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.