IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1011483.html

A novel statistical framework for meta-analysis of total mediation effect with high-dimensional omics mediators in large-scale genomic consortia

Author

Listed:
  • Zhichao Xu
  • Peng Wei

Abstract

Meta-analysis is used to aggregate the effects of interest across multiple studies, while its methodology is largely underexplored in mediation analysis, particularly in estimating the total mediation effect of high-dimensional omics mediators. Large-scale genomic consortia, such as the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program, comprise multiple cohorts with diverse technologies to elucidate the genetic architecture and biological mechanisms underlying complex human traits and diseases. Leveraging the recent established asymptotic standard error of the R-squared (R2)-based mediation effect estimation for high-dimensional omics mediators, we have developed a novel meta-analysis framework requiring only summary statistics and allowing inter-study heterogeneity. Whereas the proposed meta-analysis can uniquely evaluate and account for potential effect heterogeneity across studies due to, for example, varying genomic profiling platforms, our extensive simulations showed that the developed method was more computationally efficient and yielded satisfactory operating characteristics comparable to analysis of the pooled individual-level data when there was no inter-study heterogeneity. We applied the developed method to 5 TOPMed studies with over 5800 participants to estimate the mediation effects of gene expression on age-related variation in systolic blood pressure and sex-related variation in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The proposed method is available in R package MetaR2M on GitHub.Author summary: We have developed a novel meta-analysis framework to combine the estimates of the total mediation effect of high-dimensional omics mediators on complex traits from multiple studies in large-scale genomic consortia. By applying the developed method to genome-wide gene expression data from five studies with over 5,800 participants, we were able to demonstrate that our approach is not only computationally efficient but also yields reliable results. We illustrate how certain genes and biological pathways can influence age-related changes in blood pressure and sex differences in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Our new tool, available as an R package MetaR2M on GitHub, makes it easier for researchers to analyze such complex data. This could lead to a better understanding of the genetic architecture and biological mechanisms underlying complex human traits and diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhichao Xu & Peng Wei, 2024. "A novel statistical framework for meta-analysis of total mediation effect with high-dimensional omics mediators in large-scale genomic consortia," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011483
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011483
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011483&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    2. James Y. Dai & Janet L. Stanford & Michael LeBlanc, 2022. "A Multiple-Testing Procedure for High-Dimensional Mediation Hypotheses," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(537), pages 198-213, January.
    3. Imai, Kosuke & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2013. "Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 141-171, April.
    4. Kurex Sidik & Jeffrey N. Jonkman, 2005. "Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(2), pages 367-384, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng An & Haixiang Zhang, 2023. "High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis for Time-to-Event Outcomes with Additive Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Cai, Xizhen & Zhu, Yeying & Huang, Yuan & Ghosh, Debashis, 2022. "High-dimensional causal mediation analysis based on partial linear structural equation models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Tomohiro Ando & Ruey S. Tsay, 2009. "Model selection for generalized linear models with factor‐augmented predictors," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 207-235, May.
    4. Ejeta, Tadesse Tolera & Bai, Xiuguang, 2026. "Does the adoption of agricultural green production technologies improve eco-efficiency? Evidence from wheat farmers in Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Yu, Dalei & Ding, Chang & He, Na & Wang, Ruiwu & Zhou, Xiaohua & Shi, Lei, 2019. "Robust estimation and confidence interval in meta-regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 93-118.
    6. Fengxia Dong & Wendy Zeng, 2024. "Effects of Fall and Winter Cover Crops on Weed Suppression in the United States: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Matthew G. Cox & Yasemin Kisbu-Sakarya & Milica MioÄ ević & David P. MacKinnon, 2013. "Sensitivity Plots for Confounder Bias in the Single Mediator Model," Evaluation Review, , vol. 37(5), pages 405-431, October.
    8. Junyang Qian & Yosuke Tanigawa & Wenfei Du & Matthew Aguirre & Chris Chang & Robert Tibshirani & Manuel A Rivas & Trevor Hastie, 2020. "A fast and scalable framework for large-scale and ultrahigh-dimensional sparse regression with application to the UK Biobank," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-30, October.
    9. Lan, Wei & Ding, Yue & Fang, Zheng & Fang, Kuangnan, 2016. "Testing covariates in high dimension linear regression with latent factors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 25-37.
    10. Fan, Jianqing & Jiang, Bai & Sun, Qiang, 2022. "Bayesian factor-adjusted sparse regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 3-19.
    11. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    12. Hang Yu & Yuanjia Wang & Donglin Zeng, 2023. "A general framework of nonparametric feature selection in high‐dimensional data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 951-963, June.
    13. Yi Liu & Qihua Wang, 2018. "Model-free feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional data conditional on some variables," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(2), pages 283-301, April.
    14. Parker Hevron, 2018. "Judicialization and Its Effects: Experiments as a Way Forward," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Wang, Shangshan & Xiang, Liming, 2017. "Two-layer EM algorithm for ALD mixture regression models: A new solution to composite quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 136-154.
    16. Sweata Sen & Damitri Kundu & Kiranmoy Das, 2023. "Variable selection for categorical response: a comparative study," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 809-826, June.
    17. Jing Zhang & Qihua Wang & Xuan Wang, 2022. "Surrogate-variable-based model-free feature screening for survival data under the general censoring mechanism," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(2), pages 379-397, April.
    18. Sauvenier, Mathieu & Van Bellegem, Sébastien, 2023. "Direction Identification and Minimax Estimation by Generalized Eigenvalue Problem in High Dimensional Sparse Regression," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2023005, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    19. Jie-Huei Wang & Cheng-Yu Liu & You-Ruei Min & Zih-Han Wu & Po-Lin Hou, 2024. "Cancer Diagnosis by Gene-Environment Interactions via Combination of SMOTE-Tomek and Overlapped Group Screening Approaches with Application to Imbalanced TCGA Clinical and Genomic Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Mathur, Maya B & VanderWeele, Tyler, 2017. "Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in meta-analyses," OSF Preprints jkhfg, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.