IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1010907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 Severity: A polygenic risk score approach across three large biobanks

Author

Listed:
  • Lars G Fritsche
  • Kisung Nam
  • Jiacong Du
  • Ritoban Kundu
  • Maxwell Salvatore
  • Xu Shi
  • Seunggeun Lee
  • Stephen Burgess
  • Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract

Objective: To overcome the limitations associated with the collection and curation of COVID-19 outcome data in biobanks, this study proposes the use of polygenic risk scores (PRS) as reliable proxies of COVID-19 severity across three large biobanks: the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI), UK Biobank (UKB), and NIH All of Us. The goal is to identify associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 severity. Methods: Drawing on a sample of more than 500,000 individuals from the three biobanks, we conducted a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) to identify associations between a PRS for COVID-19 severity, derived from a genome-wide association study on COVID-19 hospitalization, and clinical pre-existing, pre-pandemic phenotypes. We performed cohort-specific PRS PheWAS and a subsequent fixed-effects meta-analysis. Results: The current study uncovered 23 pre-existing conditions significantly associated with the COVID-19 severity PRS in cohort-specific analyses, of which 21 were observed in the UKB cohort and two in the MGI cohort. The meta-analysis yielded 27 significant phenotypes predominantly related to obesity, metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular conditions. After adjusting for body mass index, several clinical phenotypes, such as hypercholesterolemia and gastrointestinal disorders, remained associated with an increased risk of hospitalization following COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: By employing PRS as a proxy for COVID-19 severity, we corroborated known risk factors and identified novel associations between pre-existing clinical phenotypes and COVID-19 severity. Our study highlights the potential value of using PRS when actual outcome data may be limited or inadequate for robust analyses. Author summary: In our study, we addressed a pressing issue arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, namely identifying who is vulnerable to severe complications that require hospitalization. Some pre-existing health conditions can increase risk for hospitalization, but identifying these conditions is challenging when directly relying on imperfect health records. Instead, we used genetic information to predict COVID-19 severity. By combining the risk effects of multiple genetic variants, as estimated by an external study, into a single score, we aimed to capture the predisposition to severe illness from COVID-19.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars G Fritsche & Kisung Nam & Jiacong Du & Ritoban Kundu & Maxwell Salvatore & Xu Shi & Seunggeun Lee & Stephen Burgess & Bhramar Mukherjee, 2023. "Uncovering associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 Severity: A polygenic risk score approach across three large biobanks," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1010907
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1010907
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1010907&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gareth J. Griffith & Tim T. Morris & Matthew J. Tudball & Annie Herbert & Giulia Mancano & Lindsey Pike & Gemma C. Sharp & Jonathan Sterne & Tom M. Palmer & George Davey Smith & Kate Tilling & Luisa Z, 2020. "Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin Frake & Andreas Hagemann & Jose Uribe, 2024. "Collider bias in strategy and management research: An illustration using women CEO's effect on other women's career outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1393-1419, July.
    2. Ivan Berlin & Daniel Thomas, 2020. "Does Smoking Protect against Being Hospitalized for COVID-19?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-2, December.
    3. Gianmarco Mignogna & Caitlin E. Carey & Robbee Wedow & Nikolas Baya & Mattia Cordioli & Nicola Pirastu & Rino Bellocco & Kathryn Fiuza Malerbi & Michel G. Nivard & Benjamin M. Neale & Raymond K. Walte, 2023. "Patterns of item nonresponse behaviour to survey questionnaires are systematic and associated with genetic loci," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 1371-1387, August.
    4. Miao Jenny Hua & Gisela Butera & Oluwaseun Akinyemi & Deborah Porterfield, 2024. "Biases and limitations in observational studies of Long COVID prevalence and risk factors: A rapid systematic umbrella review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1010907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.