IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating criminal justice reform during COVID-19: The need for a novel sentiment analysis package

Author

Listed:
  • Divya Ramjee
  • Louisa H Smith
  • Anhvinh Doanvo
  • Marie-Laure Charpignon
  • Alyssa McNulty-Nebel
  • Elle Lett
  • Angel N Desai
  • Maimuna S Majumder

Abstract

The health and safety of incarcerated persons and correctional personnel have been prominent in the U.S. news media discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic. Examining changing attitudes toward the health of the incarcerated population is imperative to better assess the extent to which the general public favors criminal justice reform. However, existing natural language processing lexicons that underlie current sentiment analysis (SA) algorithms may not perform adequately on news articles related to criminal justice due to contextual complexities. News discourse during the pandemic has highlighted the need for a novel SA lexicon and algorithm (i.e., an SA package) tailored for examining public health policy in the context of the criminal justice system. We analyzed the performance of existing SA packages on a corpus of news articles at the intersection of COVID-19 and criminal justice collected from state-level outlets between January and May 2020. Our results demonstrated that sentence sentiment scores provided by three popular SA packages can differ considerably from manually-curated ratings. This dissimilarity was especially pronounced when the text was more polarized, whether negatively or positively. A randomly selected set of 1,000 manually scored sentences, and the corresponding binary document term matrices, were used to train two new sentiment prediction algorithms (i.e., linear regression and random forest regression) to verify the performance of the manually-curated ratings. By better accounting for the unique context in which incarceration-related terminologies are used in news media, both of our proposed models outperformed all existing SA packages considered for comparison. Our findings suggest that there is a need to develop a novel lexicon, and potentially an accompanying algorithm, for analysis of text related to public health within the criminal justice system, as well as criminal justice more broadly.Author summary: Incarceration is a social cause of disease, with currently and formerly incarcerated individuals being more likely to face vulnerabilities to disease outbreaks. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the health-related shortcomings in the U.S. prison system, prompting the U.S. Department of Justice to consider reforming early release and home confinement measures. Public attention and news media coverage has concurrently increased, with particular attention to criminal justice reform initiatives and systemic ethnoracial inequities. Here, we attempted to characterize public sentiment towards criminal justice reform, in light of the pandemic and public health concerns, using existing tools to assessing positive, negative, and neutral sentiment. Our findings suggest these existing tools are inadequate for accurately gauging sentiment in texts at the intersection of public health and criminal justice, but also for potentially for texts related to criminal justice more broadly. Along with other approaches, properly validated tools for understanding sentiment can assist in gauging the scope of public health and reform measures for incarcerated persons and public support for or against criminal justice reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Divya Ramjee & Louisa H Smith & Anhvinh Doanvo & Marie-Laure Charpignon & Alyssa McNulty-Nebel & Elle Lett & Angel N Desai & Maimuna S Majumder, 2022. "Evaluating criminal justice reform during COVID-19: The need for a novel sentiment analysis package," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000063
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000063&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meghan A Novisky & Kathryn M Nowotny & Dylan B Jackson & Alexander Testa & Michael G Vaughn, 2021. "Incarceration as a Fundamental Social Cause of Health Inequalities: Jails, Prisons and Vulnerability to COVID-19 [‘Flattening the Curve for Incarcerated Populations—Covid-19 in Jails and Prisons’]," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(6), pages 1630-1646.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Semenza, Daniel C. & Silver, Ian A., 2022. "Stuck in the cycle? Assessing a reciprocal model of incarceration, health, and relative risk over twenty-five years," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Fahmy, Chantal & Mitchell, Meghan M., 2022. "Examining recidivism during reentry: Proposing a holistic model of health and wellbeing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Wilson Albert Appiah, 2024. "Examining the Access to Healthcare Among Inmates In Ghana Since 1992: A Case Study on Manhyia Local Prison," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 2819-2833, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.