IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colonization times in Moran process on graphs

Author

Listed:
  • Lenka Kopfová
  • Josef Tkadlec

Abstract

Moran Birth-death process is a standard stochastic process that is used to model natural selection in spatially structured populations. A newly occurring mutation that invades a population of residents can either fixate on the whole population or it can go extinct due to random drift. The duration of the process depends not only on the total population size n, but also on the spatial structure of the population. In this work, we consider the Moran process with a single type of individuals who invade and colonize an otherwise empty environment. Mathematically, this corresponds to the setting where the residents have zero reproduction rate, thus they never reproduce. The spatial structure is represented by a graph. We present two main contributions. First, in contrast to the Moran process in which residents do reproduce, we show that the colonization time is always at most a polynomial function of the population size n. Namely, we show that colonization always takes at most 12n3−12n2 expected steps, and for each n, we identify the slowest graph where it takes exactly that many steps. Moreover, we establish a stronger bound of roughly n2.5 steps for undirected graphs and an even stronger bound of roughly n2 steps for so-called regular graphs. Second, we discuss various complications that one faces when attempting to measure fixation times and colonization times in spatially structured populations, and we propose to measure the real duration of the process, rather than counting the steps of the classic Moran process.Author summary: Consider an invasive species that is about to colonize an otherwise empty environment. In the absence of natural enemies, the species will eventually spread everywhere, but the time until the colonization is completed will depend on the exact spatial layout of the individual sites. In this work, we analyze this colonization time for various spatial layouts. We give precise formulas for the average colonization time for several commonly studied spatial layouts (such as well-mixed populations, cycles, or stars). For each population size n, we also identify the slowest layout and show that the corresponding (slowest possible) colonization time is cubic in the population size n. Moreover, we prove an asymptotically tight general bound on the colonization time that applies to any lattice-like layout, and another bound that applies to any layout in which all connections are two-way. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results for further study of a related, well-researched quantity called the fixation time.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenka Kopfová & Josef Tkadlec, 2025. "Colonization times in Moran process on graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012868
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012868&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erez Lieberman & Christoph Hauert & Martin A. Nowak, 2005. "Evolutionary dynamics on graphs," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7023), pages 312-316, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Bentley & Michael O’Brien & Paul Ormerod, 2011. "Quality versus mere popularity: a conceptual map for understanding human behavior," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 10(2), pages 181-191, December.
    2. Arnaud Z. Dragicevic, 2025. "The Price Identity of Replicator(–Mutator) Dynamics on Graphs with Quantum Strategies in a Public Goods Game," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 74-102, March.
    3. Zhang, Hui & Wang, Li & Hou, Dongshuang, 2016. "Effect of the spatial autocorrelation of empty sites on the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 296-308.
    4. Huo, Ran & Durrett, Rick, 2018. "Latent voter model on locally tree-like random graphs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 128(5), pages 1590-1614.
    5. Laura Schmid & Farbod Ekbatani & Christian Hilbe & Krishnendu Chatterjee, 2023. "Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Feng, Sinan & Liu, Xuesong & Dong, Yida, 2022. "Limited punishment pool may promote cooperation in the public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    7. Wakano, Joe Yuichiro & Ohtsuki, Hisashi & Kobayashi, Yutaka, 2013. "A mathematical description of the inclusive fitness theory," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 46-55.
    8. Tetsushi Ohdaira, 2021. "Cooperation evolves by the payoff-difference-based probabilistic reward," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(11), pages 1-8, November.
    9. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu & Chen, Wei & Dai, Wenhui, 2024. "Evolution of cooperation under corrupt institutions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Tomas Ferreira Amaro Freire & Zhijian Hu & Kevin B Wood & Erida Gjini, 2024. "Modeling spatial evolution of multi-drug resistance under drug environmental gradients," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-30, May.
    11. Bryant, Adam S. & Lavrentovich, Maxim O., 2022. "Survival in branching cellular populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 13-23.
    12. McAvoy, Alex & Fraiman, Nicolas & Hauert, Christoph & Wakeley, John & Nowak, Martin A., 2018. "Public goods games in populations with fluctuating size," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 72-84.
    13. Qiguang An & Hongfeng Guo & Yating Zheng, 2022. "On Robust Stability and Stabilization of Networked Evolutionary Games with Time Delays," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Nie, Yanyi & Zhong, Xiaoni & Lin, Tao & Wang, Wei, 2023. "Pathogen diversity in meta-population networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Hong, Lijun & Geng, Yini & Du, Chunpeng & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2021. "Average payoff-driven or imitation? A new evidence from evolutionary game theory in finite populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    16. Alexander J. Stewart & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2015. "The Evolvability of Cooperation under Local and Non-Local Mutations," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Benjamin Allen & Christine Sample & Yulia Dementieva & Ruben C Medeiros & Christopher Paoletti & Martin A Nowak, 2015. "The Molecular Clock of Neutral Evolution Can Be Accelerated or Slowed by Asymmetric Spatial Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-32, February.
    18. Christopher Graser & Takako Fujiwara-Greve & Julián García & Matthijs van Veelen, 2025. "Repeated games with partner choice," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Thomas Graham & Maria Kleshnina & Jerzy A. Filar, 2023. "Where Do Mistakes Lead? A Survey of Games with Incompetent Players," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 231-264, March.
    20. Li, Jing & Wang, Jiang, 2018. "Locality based wealth rule favors cooperation in costly public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-7.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.